Skip to content

Deprecated JUnit4 #4835

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

Coen90
Copy link

@Coen90 Coen90 commented May 7, 2025

This PR primarily focuses on reflecting the deprecation of JUnit 4 within the Spring Batch project.

Here's a breakdown of the changes:

  • Documentation Update (testing.adoc):

    • A note has been added to the testing documentation explicitly stating that Spring Batch no longer supports JUnit 4 and recommends users migrate to JUnit Jupiter.
  • Javadoc Updates in Test Listeners (JobScopeTestExecutionListener.java, StepScopeTestExecutionListener.java):

    • The example usage in the Javadoc for both JobScopeTestExecutionListener and StepScopeTestExecutionListener has been modified.
    • The @RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class) annotation, specific to JUnit 4, has been removed from these examples.
    • The @SpringJUnitConfig annotation, which is typically used with JUnit 5, has been added to these examples.
  • Javadoc and Example Removal in SpringBatchTest.java:

    • The detailed Javadoc example demonstrating how to use @SpringBatchTest with JUnit 4 has been removed.
    • A clear statement has been added to the Javadoc for the @SpringBatchTest annotation, indicating that "JUnit4 is deprecated in Spring Batch 6.0.0 and will be removed in a future release."

In essence, these changes remove JUnit 4 specific examples and guidance, update documentation to reflect its deprecation, and point towards JUnit 5 (Jupiter) as the recommended testing framework.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant