Skip to content

Use blank issue title for MCP issue template #879

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2025

Conversation

jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

To hopefully make it less likely for people to forget to change their MCP issue title.

See #t-compiler/major changes > Retroactive MCP for the Rust for Linux Ec… compiler-team#874 @ 💬

r? @apiraino

To hopefully make it less likely for people to forget to change their
MCP issue title.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 29, 2025

Error: The feature assign is not enabled in this repository.
To enable it add its section in the triagebot.toml in the root of the repository.

Please file an issue on GitHub at triagebot if there's a problem with this bot, or reach out on #t-infra on Zulip.

programmerjake added a commit to programmerjake/libs-team that referenced this pull request May 29, 2025
There's a near identical PR for compiler MCPs: rust-lang/compiler-team#879

> To hopefully make it less likely for people to forget to change their MCP issue title.
>
> See #t-compiler/major changes > Retroactive MCP for the Rust for Linux Ec… compiler-team#874 @ 💬
Copy link
Contributor

@apiraino apiraino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, good idea. The issue title is mandatory so that should block the submission. Thanks!

@apiraino apiraino merged commit 97f65b7 into rust-lang:master May 29, 2025
@jieyouxu jieyouxu deleted the blank-mcp-title branch May 29, 2025 08:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants