Skip to content

Comments

(bug) reset profile Status.DependenciesHash#1101

Merged
gianlucam76 merged 1 commit intoprojectsveltos:mainfrom
gianlucam76:dependencies
Mar 17, 2025
Merged

(bug) reset profile Status.DependenciesHash#1101
gianlucam76 merged 1 commit intoprojectsveltos:mainfrom
gianlucam76:dependencies

Conversation

@gianlucam76
Copy link
Member

In Sveltos v0.50.0, when a ClusterProfile utilizes the dependsOn field to establish dependencies between profiles, Sveltos incorrectly modifies the Spec.ClusterRefs field. This field is intended for user configuration and should not be altered by Sveltos.

Root Cause:

When Sveltos determines that a ClusterProfile needs to be deployed to a new cluster due to dependency requirements, it mistakenly updates the Spec.ClusterRefs field. This unintended modification leads to potential conflicts with user-defined configurations.

Solution:

Instead of modifying Spec.ClusterRefs, Sveltos should reset the Status.DependenciesHash field of the ClusterProfile. This action will trigger a new reconciliation loop, ensuring that Sveltos correctly evaluates and deploys the ClusterProfile to the necessary clusters based on its dependencies.

Detailed Explanation:

  1. Dependencies and Deployment:

    • ClusterProfiles can define dependencies using the dependsOn field.
    • Sveltos tracks these dependencies to ensure that prerequisite profiles are deployed before dependent profiles.
    • This dependency tracking should function independently of the ClusterSelectors specified in the ClusterProfile.
    • If a ClusterProfile is required on a cluster due to its dependencies, even if its ClusterSelectors do not initially match, Sveltos should deploy it.
  2. The Bug:

    • In v0.50.0, Sveltos incorrectly modifies Spec.ClusterRefs when a dependent ClusterProfile needs to be deployed to a new cluster.
    • Spec.ClusterRefs is a user-configurable field that should only be modified by the user.
    • Modifying this field breaks the principle of least surprise and can lead to unexpected behavior.
  3. The Correct Approach:

    • When Sveltos detects a dependency that requires deployment to a new cluster, it should reset the Status.DependenciesHash field of the ClusterProfile.
    • Resetting Status.DependenciesHash forces a reconciliation of the ClusterProfile.
    • During reconciliation, Sveltos will re-evaluate the dependencies and the cluster selection logic.
    • This ensures that the ClusterProfile is deployed to the necessary clusters without modifying the user-defined Spec.ClusterRefs.
  4. Benefits of the Solution:

    • Preserves the integrity of the user-defined Spec.ClusterRefs field.
    • Maintains the expected behavior of ClusterProfile dependencies.
    • Ensures that ClusterProfiles are deployed correctly based on dependencies, regardless of their ClusterSelectors.
    • Avoids unintended side effects.

Fixes #1100

In Sveltos v0.50.0, when a ClusterProfile utilizes the `dependsOn` field
to establish dependencies between profiles, Sveltos incorrectly modifies
the `Spec.ClusterRefs` field. This field is intended for user configuration
and should not be altered by Sveltos.

**Root Cause:**

When Sveltos determines that a ClusterProfile needs to be deployed to a new
cluster due to dependency requirements, it mistakenly updates the `Spec.ClusterRefs`
field. This unintended modification leads to  potential conflicts with user-defined
configurations.

**Solution:**

Instead of modifying `Spec.ClusterRefs`, Sveltos should reset the `Status.DependenciesHash`
field of the ClusterProfile. This action will trigger a new reconciliation loop, ensuring
that Sveltos correctly evaluates and deploys the ClusterProfile to the necessary clusters
based on its dependencies.

**Detailed Explanation:**

1.  **Dependencies and Deployment:**
    * ClusterProfiles can define dependencies using the `dependsOn` field.
    * Sveltos tracks these dependencies to ensure that prerequisite profiles are deployed before dependent profiles.
    * This dependency tracking should function independently of the `ClusterSelectors` specified in the ClusterProfile.
    * If a ClusterProfile is required on a cluster due to its dependencies, even if its `ClusterSelectors` do not initially match, Sveltos should deploy it.

2.  **The Bug:**
    * In v0.50.0, Sveltos incorrectly modifies `Spec.ClusterRefs` when a dependent ClusterProfile needs to be deployed to a new cluster.
    * `Spec.ClusterRefs` is a user-configurable field that should only be modified by the user.
    * Modifying this field breaks the principle of least surprise and can lead to unexpected behavior.

3.  **The Correct Approach:**
    * When Sveltos detects a dependency that requires deployment to a new cluster, it should reset the `Status.DependenciesHash` field of the ClusterProfile.
    * Resetting `Status.DependenciesHash` forces a reconciliation of the ClusterProfile.
    * During reconciliation, Sveltos will re-evaluate the dependencies and the cluster selection logic.
    * This ensures that the ClusterProfile is deployed to the necessary clusters without modifying the user-defined `Spec.ClusterRefs`.

4.  **Benefits of the Solution:**
    * Preserves the integrity of the user-defined `Spec.ClusterRefs` field.
    * Maintains the expected behavior of ClusterProfile dependencies.
    * Ensures that ClusterProfiles are deployed correctly based on dependencies, regardless of their `ClusterSelectors`.
    * Avoids unintended side effects.
@gianlucam76 gianlucam76 merged commit 68dbed2 into projectsveltos:main Mar 17, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@gianlucam76 gianlucam76 deleted the dependencies branch March 17, 2025 16:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BUG: dependencies changing clusterRefs

1 participant