Conversation
The line was not shown as added
WalkthroughThis pull request updates comment annotations in the BetterAuth Next.js documentation guide. A placeholder comment marker is replaced with standardized Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
content/800-guides/230-betterauth-nextjs.mdx (1)
636-636: Minor: Some code blocks still use the older//add-next-linemarker.For full consistency, you may want to update the import statements at lines 636 and 827 to use the same
//add-startand//add-endformat applied elsewhere. This is optional in this PR, but it would complete the standardization effort.Also applies to: 827-827
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
content/800-guides/230-betterauth-nextjs.mdx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
content/800-guides/230-betterauth-nextjs.mdx (1)
434-436: Good standardization of comment markers.The change correctly wraps the
signUpimport with//add-startand//add-enddelimiters, standardizing the annotation format for documentation processing. This is cleaner than the single-line//add-next-linemarker and makes the intent clearer.
|
👋 Hi @Warreronavtki! Thanks for your contribution to the Prisma docs. We wanted to let you know that we've recently updated our documentation structure and guidelines. Your PR may need to be updated to align with these changes. Action needed:
|
The line was not shown as added
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.