Skip to content

Move fixed tests into their appropriate locations.#49

Merged
TristonianJones merged 2 commits intogoogle:masterfrom
TristonianJones:fixed-tests
Feb 5, 2019
Merged

Move fixed tests into their appropriate locations.#49
TristonianJones merged 2 commits intogoogle:masterfrom
TristonianJones:fixed-tests

Conversation

@TristonianJones
Copy link
Collaborator

Move fixed tests out of broken.textproto and into their rightful homes.

Copy link
Contributor

@gabrielsz gabrielsz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi! They all look good. The only ask is to rename the first 2 tests (based on Jim's feedback on my own PRs), and remove 1 comment which I think should no longer apply

value: { bool_value: false }
}
test {
name: "self_test_equals_mixed_types"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you rename this test to eq_mixed_types?

}
}
test {
name: "self_test_not_equals_data_type"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you rename this test to not_eq_list_data_type?

expr: "[1] == [1.0]"
disable_check: true # need to make it fail in the evaluation phase
eval_error: {
# Note: The type checker error shows (list(int), list(double)) instead
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is now an implementation detail, should we remove it?

Copy link
Contributor

@madi8229 madi8229 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@TristonianJones TristonianJones merged commit ed140f4 into google:master Feb 5, 2019
@TristonianJones TristonianJones deleted the fixed-tests branch February 5, 2019 05:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants