ref: remove BitbucketMixin #88228
Merged
ref: remove BitbucketMixin #88228
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
not really saving any code duplication -- and the type checker hated it
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is ✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #88228 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 87.71% 87.71%
=======================================
Files 9988 9987 -1
Lines 565070 565115 +45
Branches 22289 22289
=======================================
+ Hits 495629 495674 +45
Misses 69006 69006
Partials 435 435 |
wedamija
approved these changes
Mar 28, 2025
andrewshie-sentry
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
not really saving any code duplication -- and the type checker hated it <!-- Describe your PR here. -->
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
not really saving any code duplication -- and the type checker hated it