Drop coreapi support for DRF 3.17 #9583
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
951c960 to
e8c0236
Compare
|
Question while working with PR. The documentation says: “Support for generating default schemas will be moved to a separate package and then removed”. For this PR, should we remove coreapi and everything related to it, or all code related to the whole If you need to remove everything related to schemas from the |
…rt schema generation
…port Schema generation
…does not support Schema generation
|
@auvipy I'm sorry if the tags are annoying. But this is the only place we can make design decisions about PR, and I'd love to hear your thoughts on what I should do.. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
refs #8453
As discussed in #8453, we are deprecating the coreapi for drf 3.17.
I read the discussion in detail, and I'm wondering if it was decided to “leave all schema generation logic in the library that generates the schema (drf-spectacular), and drf will not be involved in schema generation” (drf-spectacular will be part of drf?) The comments in the linked discussion say that...