This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 8, 2024. It is now read-only.
Merged
Conversation
… empty its list of barcodes, in order that if it starts again, it does not publicise the old values.
NickHolcombe
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2019
Contributor
NickHolcombe
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When the processor receives the stop command. It should empty its list of barcodes, in order that if it starts again, it does not publicise the old values.
Since the
BarcodeScannerhas an empty check, it means when theBarcodeScanner.barcodesObservergets attached again, it will not publicise the old values again.This was raised in #24
This change is