| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Commit 14e87ffa5c5 introduced support for adding comments to NOT NULL
constraints. However, CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING COMMENTS did not copy
these comments to the new table. This was an oversight in that commit.
This commit corrects the behavior by ensuring CREATE TABLE LIKE to also copy
the comments on NOT NULL constraints when INCLUDING COMMENTS is specified.
Author: Jian He <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
This expands the NOT ENFORCED constraint flag, previously only
supported for CHECK constraints (commit ca87c415e2f), to foreign key
constraints.
Normally, when a foreign key constraint is created on a table, action
and check triggers are added to maintain data integrity. With this
patch, if a constraint is marked as NOT ENFORCED, integrity checks are
no longer required, making these triggers unnecessary. Consequently,
when creating a NOT ENFORCED foreign key constraint, triggers will not
be created, and the constraint will be marked as NOT VALID.
Similarly, if an existing foreign key constraint is changed to NOT
ENFORCED, the associated triggers will be dropped, and the constraint
will also be marked as NOT VALID. Conversely, if a NOT ENFORCED
foreign key constraint is changed to ENFORCED, the necessary triggers
will be created, and the will be changed to VALID by performing
necessary validation.
Since not-enforced foreign key constraints have no triggers, the
shortcut used for example in psql and pg_dump to skip looking for
foreign keys if the relation is known not to have triggers no longer
applies. (It already didn't work for partitioned tables.)
Author: Amul Sul <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Joel Jacobson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: jian he <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Isaac Morland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexandra Wang <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Triveni N <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAAJ_b962c5AcYW9KUt_R_ER5qs3fUGbe4az-SP-vuwPS-w-AGA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This was left out of the original patch for virtual generated columns
(commit 83ea6c54025).
This just involves a bit of extra work in the executor to expand the
generation expressions and run a "IS NOT NULL" test against them.
There is also a bit of work to make sure that not-null constraints are
checked during a table rewrite.
Author: jian he <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Xuneng Zhou <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Navneet Kumar <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxHArQysbDkWFmvK+D1TPHQWWTxWN15cMuUaTYX3xhQXgg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The comment explained that ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT USING INDEX is
only supported with a btree index. (This is not being changed.) The
reason is to keep upgrades robust, as explained there. The other part
of the comment, that btree is the only unique index kind anyway, is
somewhat less true as we're trying to enable unique indexes other than
btree, and it's irrelevant to this check. There is a check for
indisunique earlier already. So just remove this part of the comment.
Author: Mark Dilger <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/[email protected]
|
|
LIKE enables the creation of foreign tables based on the column
definitions, constraints and objects of the defined source relation(s).
This feature mirrors the behavior of CREATE TABLE LIKE, but ignores
the INCLUDING sub-options that do not make sense for foreign tables:
INDEXES, COMPRESSION, IDENTITY and STORAGE. The supported sub-options
are COMMENTS, CONSTRAINTS, DEFAULTS, GENERATED and STATISTICS, mapping
with the clauses already supported by the command.
Note that the restriction with LIKE in CREATE FOREIGN TABLE was added in
a0c6dfeecfcc.
Author: Zhang Mingli
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Sami Imseih, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/42d3f855-2275-4361-a42a-826172ca2dc4@Spark
|
|
This adds a new variant of generated columns that are computed on read
(like a view, unlike the existing stored generated columns, which are
computed on write, like a materialized view).
The syntax for the column definition is
... GENERATED ALWAYS AS (...) VIRTUAL
and VIRTUAL is also optional. VIRTUAL is the default rather than
STORED to match various other SQL products. (The SQL standard makes
no specification about this, but it also doesn't know about VIRTUAL or
STORED.) (Also, virtual views are the default, rather than
materialized views.)
Virtual generated columns are stored in tuples as null values. (A
very early version of this patch had the ambition to not store them at
all. But so much stuff breaks or gets confused if you have tuples
where a column in the middle is completely missing. This is a
compromise, and it still saves space over being forced to use stored
generated columns. If we ever find a way to improve this, a bit of
pg_upgrade cleverness could allow for upgrades to a newer scheme.)
The capabilities and restrictions of virtual generated columns are
mostly the same as for stored generated columns. In some cases, this
patch keeps virtual generated columns more restricted than they might
technically need to be, to keep the two kinds consistent. Some of
that could maybe be relaxed later after separate careful
considerations.
Some functionality that is currently not supported, but could possibly
be added as incremental features, some easier than others:
- index on or using a virtual column
- hence also no unique constraints on virtual columns
- extended statistics on virtual columns
- foreign-key constraints on virtual columns
- not-null constraints on virtual columns (check constraints are supported)
- ALTER TABLE / DROP EXPRESSION
- virtual column cannot have domain type
- virtual columns are not supported in logical replication
The tests in generated_virtual.sql have been copied over from
generated_stored.sql with the keyword replaced. This way we can make
sure the behavior is mostly aligned, and the differences can be
visible. Some tests for currently not supported features are
currently commented out.
Reviewed-by: Jian He <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Shlok Kyal <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/[email protected]
|
|
This adds support for the NOT ENFORCED/ENFORCED flag for constraints,
with support for check constraints.
The plan is to eventually support this for foreign key constraints,
where it is typically more useful.
Note that CHECK constraints do not currently support ALTER operations,
so changing the enforceability of an existing constraint isn't
possible without dropping and recreating it. This could be added
later.
Author: Amul Sul <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: jian he <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Triveni N <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAAJ_b962c5AcYW9KUt_R_ER5qs3fUGbe4az-SP-vuwPS-w-AGA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
The following commands gain some information about the error position in
the query, should they fail when looking at the type used:
- CREATE TYPE (LIKE)
- CREATE TABLE OF
Both are related to typenameType() where the type name lookup is done.
These calls gain the ParseState that already exists in these paths.
Author: Kirill Reshke, Jian He
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALdSSPhqfvKbDwqJaY=yEePi_aq61GmMpW88i6ZH7CMG_2Z4Cg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
We now create contype='n' pg_constraint rows for not-null constraints on
user tables. Only one such constraint is allowed for a column.
We propagate these constraints to other tables during operations such as
adding inheritance relationships, creating and attaching partitions and
creating tables LIKE other tables. These related constraints mostly
follow the well-known rules of conislocal and coninhcount that we have
for CHECK constraints, with some adaptations: for example, as opposed to
CHECK constraints, we don't match not-null ones by name when descending
a hierarchy to alter or remove it, instead matching by the name of the
column that they apply to. This means we don't require the constraint
names to be identical across a hierarchy.
The inheritance status of these constraints can be controlled: now we
can be sure that if a parent table has one, then all children will have
it as well. They can optionally be marked NO INHERIT, and then children
are free not to have one. (There's currently no support for altering a
NO INHERIT constraint into inheriting down the hierarchy, but that's a
desirable future feature.)
This also opens the door for having these constraints be marked NOT
VALID, as well as allowing UNIQUE+NOT NULL to be used for functional
dependency determination, as envisioned by commit e49ae8d3bc58. It's
likely possible to allow DEFERRABLE constraints as followup work, as
well.
psql shows these constraints in \d+, though we may want to reconsider if
this turns out to be too noisy. Earlier versions of this patch hid
constraints that were on the same columns of the primary key, but I'm
not sure that that's very useful. If clutter is a problem, we might be
better off inventing a new \d++ command and not showing the constraints
in \d+.
For now, we omit these constraints on system catalog columns, because
they're unlikely to achieve anything.
The main difference to the previous attempt at this (b0e96f311985) is
that we now require that such a constraint always exists when a primary
key is in the column; we didn't require this previously which had a
number of unpalatable consequences. With this requirement, the code is
easier to reason about. For example:
- We no longer have "throwaway constraints" during pg_dump. We needed
those for the case where a table had a PK without a not-null
underneath, to prevent a slow scan of the data during restore of the
PK creation, which was particularly problematic for pg_upgrade.
- We no longer have to cope with attnotnull being set spuriously in
case a primary key is dropped indirectly (e.g., via DROP COLUMN).
Some bits of code in this patch were authored by Jian He.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Author: Bernd Helmle <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: 何建 (jian he) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: 王刚 (Tender Wang) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
Since we introduced unlogged sequences in v15, identity sequences
have defaulted to having the same persistence as their owning table.
However, it is possible to change that with ALTER SEQUENCE, and
pg_dump tries to preserve the logged-ness of sequences when it doesn't
match (as indeed it wouldn't for an unlogged table from before v15).
The fly in the ointment is that ALTER SEQUENCE SET [UN]LOGGED fails
in binary-upgrade mode, because it needs to assign a new relfilenode
which we cannot permit in that mode. Thus, trying to pg_upgrade a
database containing a mismatching identity sequence failed.
To fix, add syntax to ADD/ALTER COLUMN GENERATED AS IDENTITY to allow
the sequence's persistence to be set correctly at creation, and use
that instead of ALTER SEQUENCE SET [UN]LOGGED in pg_dump. (I tried to
make SET [UN]LOGGED work without any pg_dump modifications, but that
seems too fragile to be a desirable answer. This way should be
markedly faster anyhow.)
In passing, document the previously-undocumented SEQUENCE NAME option
that pg_dump also relies on for identity sequences; I see no value
in trying to pretend it doesn't exist.
Per bug #18618 from Anthony Hsu.
Back-patch to v15 where we invented this stuff.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
Add WITHOUT OVERLAPS clause to PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints.
These are backed by GiST indexes instead of B-tree indexes, since they
are essentially exclusion constraints with = for the scalar parts of
the key and && for the temporal part.
(previously committed as 46a0cd4cefb, reverted by 46a0cd4cefb; the new
part is this:)
Because 'empty' && 'empty' is false, the temporal PK/UQ constraint
allowed duplicates, which is confusing to users and breaks internal
expectations. For instance, when GROUP BY checks functional
dependencies on the PK, it allows selecting other columns from the
table, but in the presence of duplicate keys you could get the value
from any of their rows. So we need to forbid empties.
This all means that at the moment we can only support ranges and
multiranges for temporal PK/UQs, unlike the original patch (above).
Documentation and tests for this are added. But this could
conceivably be extended by introducing some more general support for
the notion of "empty" for other types.
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: jian he <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+renyUApHgSZF9-nd-a0+OPGharLQLO=mDHcY4_qQ0+noCUVg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This commit reverts 1adf16b8fb, 87c21bb941, and subsequent fixes and
improvements including df64c81ca9, c99ef1811a, 9dfcac8e15, 885742b9f8,
842c9b2705, fcf80c5d5f, 96c7381c4c, f4fc7cb54b, 60ae37a8bc, 259c96fa8f,
449cdcd486, 3ca43dbbb6, 2a679ae94e, 3a82c689fd, fbd4321fd5, d53a4286d7,
c086896625, 4e5d6c4091, 04158e7fa3.
The reason for reverting is security issues related to repeatable name lookups
(CVE-2014-0062). Even though 04158e7fa3 solved part of the problem, there
are still remaining issues, which aren't feasible to even carefully analyze
before the RC deadline.
Reported-by: Noah Misch, Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240808171351.a9.nmisch%40google.com
Backpatch-through: 17
|
|
transformTableLikeClause believed that it could process extended
statistics immediately because "the representation of CreateStatsStmt
doesn't depend on column numbers". That was true when extended stats
were first introduced, but it was falsified by the addition of
extended stats on expressions: the parsed expression tree is fed
forward by the LIKE option, and that will contain Vars. So if the
new table doesn't have attnums identical to the old one's (typically
because there are some dropped columns in the old one), that doesn't
work. The CREATE goes through, but it emits invalid statistics
objects that will cause problems later.
Fortunately, we already have logic that can adapt expression trees
to the possibly-new column numbering. To use it, we have to delay
processing of CREATE_TABLE_LIKE_STATISTICS into expandTableLikeClause,
just as for other LIKE options that involve expressions.
Per bug #18468 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to v14 where
extended statistics on expressions were added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
This feature set did not handle empty ranges correctly, and it's now
too late for PostgreSQL 17 to fix it.
The following commits are reverted:
6db4598fcb8 Add stratnum GiST support function
46a0cd4cefb Add temporal PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints
86232a49a43 Fix comment on gist_stratnum_btree
030e10ff1a3 Rename pg_constraint.conwithoutoverlaps to conperiod
a88c800deb6 Use daterange and YMD in without_overlaps tests instead of tsrange.
5577a71fb0c Use half-open interval notation in without_overlaps tests
34768ee3616 Add temporal FOREIGN KEY contraints
482e108cd38 Add test for REPLICA IDENTITY with a temporal key
c3db1f30cba doc: clarify PERIOD and WITHOUT OVERLAPS in CREATE TABLE
144c2ce0cc7 Fix ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING/UPDATE for temporal indexes
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
There are some problems with the new way to handle these constraints
that were detected at the last minute, and require fixes that appear too
invasive to be doing this late in the cycle. Revert this (again) for
now, we'll try again with these problems fixed.
The following commits are reverted:
b0e96f311985 Catalog not-null constraints
9b581c534186 Disallow changing NO INHERIT status of a not-null constraint
d0ec2ddbe088 Fix not-null constraint test
ac22a9545ca9 Move privilege check to the right place
b0f7dd915bca Check stack depth in new recursive functions
3af721794272 Update information_schema definition for not-null constraints
c3709100be73 Fix propagating attnotnull in multiple inheritance
d9f686a72ee9 Fix restore of not-null constraints with inheritance
d72d32f52d26 Don't try to assign smart names to constraints
0cd711271d42 Better handle indirect constraint drops
13daa33fa5a6 Disallow NO INHERIT not-null constraints on partitioned tables
d45597f72fe5 Disallow direct change of NO INHERIT of not-null constraints
21ac38f498b3 Fix inconsistencies in error messages
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
Currently, we check only owner permission for the parent table before
MERGE/SPLIT partition operations. This leads to a security hole when users
can get access to the data of partitions without permission. This commit
fixes this problem by requiring owner permission on all the partitions
involved.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0520c72e-8d97-245e-53f9-173beca2ab2e%40gmail.com
Author: Dmitry Koval, Alexander Korotkov
|
|
When changing the data type of a column of a partitioned table, craft
the ALTER SEQUENCE command only once. Partitions do not have identity
sequences of their own and thus do not need a ALTER SEQUENCE command
for each partition.
Fix getIdentitySequence() to fetch the identity sequence associated
with the top-level partitioned table when a Relation of a partition is
passed to it. While doing so, translate the attribute number of the
partition into the attribute number of the partitioned table.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
|
|
Such constraints are semantically useless and only bring weird cases
along, so reject them.
As a side effect, we can no longer have "throwaway" constraints in
pg_dump for primary keys in partitioned tables, but since they don't
serve any useful purpose, we can just omit them.
Maybe this should be done for all types of constraints, but it's just
not-null ones that acquired this "ability" in the 17 timeframe, so for
the moment I'm not changing anything else.
Per note by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
This fixes various typos, duplicated words, and tiny bits of whitespace
mainly in code comments but also in docs.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]>
Author: Alexander Lakhin <[email protected]>
Author: David Rowley <[email protected]>
Author: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
The fixes relate to comments, error messages, and corresponding expected output
of regression tests.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs49DDsknxyoycBqiE72VxzL_sYHF6zqL8dSeNehKPJhkKg%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/86bfd241-a58c-479a-9a72-2c67a02becf8%40postgrespro.ru
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNkGMPU50QG7V6Q60JGFORfo8LfYO1_GCkCa0VWbmB-fEw%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Richard Guo, Dmitry Koval, Tender Wang
|
|
Check that the target partition actually belongs to the parent table.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd842601-cf1a-9806-f7b7-d2509b93ba61%40gmail.com
Author: Dmitry Koval
|
|
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNkGMPU50QG7V6Q60JGFORfo8LfYO1_GCkCa0VWbmB-fEw%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Tender Wang
|
|
This new DDL command splits a single partition into several parititions.
Just like ALTER TABLE ... MERGE PARTITIONS ... command, new patitions are
created using createPartitionTable() function with parent partition as the
template.
This commit comprises quite naive implementation which works in single process
and holds the ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK on the parent table during all the
operations including the tuple routing. This is why this new DDL command
can't be recommended for large partitioned tables under a high load. However,
this implementation come in handy in certain cases even as is.
Also, it could be used as a foundation for future implementations with lesser
locking and possibly parallel.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c73a1746-0cd0-6bdd-6b23-3ae0b7c0c582%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Dmitry Koval
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent, Laurenz Albe, Zhihong Yu, Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Robert Haas, Stephane Tachoires
|
|
This new DDL command merges several partitions into the one partition of the
target table. The target partition is created using new
createPartitionTable() function with parent partition as the template.
This commit comprises quite naive implementation which works in single process
and holds the ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK on the parent table during all the
operations including the tuple routing. This is why this new DDL command
can't be recommended for large partitioned tables under a high load. However,
this implementation come in handy in certain cases even as is.
Also, it could be used as a foundation for future implementations with lesser
locking and possibly parallel.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c73a1746-0cd0-6bdd-6b23-3ae0b7c0c582%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Dmitry Koval
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent, Laurenz Albe, Zhihong Yu, Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Robert Haas, Stephane Tachoires
|
|
This reverts commit 0413a556990ba628a3de8a0b58be020fd9a14ed0.
pg_dump cannot currently dump all the structures that are allowed by
this patch. This needs more work in pg_dump and more test coverage.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/[email protected]
|
|
A child table can specify a compression or storage method different
from its parents. This was previously an error. (But this was
inconsistently enforced because for example the settings could be
changed later using ALTER TABLE.) This now also allows an explicit
override if multiple parents have different compression or storage
settings, which was previously an error that could not be overridden.
The compression and storage properties remains unchanged in a child
inheriting from parent(s) after its creation, i.e., when using ALTER
TABLE ... INHERIT. (This is not changed.)
Before this change, the error detail would mention the first pair of
conflicting parent compression or storage methods. But with this
change it waits till the child specification is considered by which
time we may have encountered many such conflicting pairs. Hence the
error detail after this change does not include the conflicting
compression/storage methods. Those can be obtained from parent
definitions if necessary. The code to maintain list of all
conflicting methods or even the first conflicting pair does not seem
worth the convenience it offers. This change is inline with what we
do with conflicting default values.
Before this commit, the specified storage method could be stored in
ColumnDef::storage (CREATE TABLE ... LIKE) or ColumnDef::storage_name
(CREATE TABLE ...). This caused the MergeChildAttribute() and
MergeInheritedAttribute() to ignore a storage method specified in the
child definition since it looked only at ColumnDef::storage. This
commit removes ColumnDef::storage and instead uses
ColumnDef::storage_name to save any storage method specification. This
is similar to how compression method specification is handled.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/[email protected]
|
|
Fix for 344d62fb9a9: That commit introduced unlogged sequences and
made it so that identity/serial sequences automatically get the
persistence level of their owning table. But this works only for
CREATE TABLE and not for ALTER TABLE / ADD COLUMN. The latter would
always create the sequence as logged (default), independent of the
persistence setting of the table. This is fixed here.
Note: It is allowed to change the persistence of identity sequences
directly using ALTER SEQUENCE. So mistakes in existing databases can
be fixed manually.
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/c4b6e2ed-bcdf-4ea7-965f-e49761094827%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Add WITHOUT OVERLAPS clause to PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints.
These are backed by GiST indexes instead of B-tree indexes, since they
are essentially exclusion constraints with = for the scalar parts of
the key and && for the temporal part.
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: jian he <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+renyUApHgSZF9-nd-a0+OPGharLQLO=mDHcY4_qQ0+noCUVg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Reported-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
This unifies some repetitive code.
Note: I didn't push the "not found" error message into the new
function, even though all existing callers would be able to make use
of it. Using the existing error handling as-is would probably require
exposing the Relation type via tupdesc.h, which doesn't seem
desirable. (Or even if we changed it to just report the OID, it would
inject the concept of a relation containing the tuple descriptor into
tupdesc.h, which might be a layering violation. Perhaps some further
improvements could be considered here separately.)
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/52a125e4-ff9a-95f5-9f61-b87cf447e4da%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Since we already have it, we might as well make full use of it,
instead of assembling ColumnDef by hand in several places.
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/[email protected]
|
|
We now create contype='n' pg_constraint rows for not-null constraints.
We propagate these constraints to other tables during operations such as
adding inheritance relationships, creating and attaching partitions and
creating tables LIKE other tables. We also spawn not-null constraints
for inheritance child tables when their parents have primary keys.
These related constraints mostly follow the well-known rules of
conislocal and coninhcount that we have for CHECK constraints, with some
adaptations: for example, as opposed to CHECK constraints, we don't
match not-null ones by name when descending a hierarchy to alter it,
instead matching by column name that they apply to. This means we don't
require the constraint names to be identical across a hierarchy.
For now, we omit them for system catalogs. Maybe this is worth
reconsidering. We don't support NOT VALID nor DEFERRABLE clauses
either; these can be added as separate features later (this patch is
already large and complicated enough.)
psql shows these constraints in \d+.
pg_dump requires some ad-hoc hacks, particularly when dumping a primary
key. We now create one "throwaway" not-null constraint for each column
in the PK together with the CREATE TABLE command, and once the PK is
created, all those throwaway constraints are removed. This avoids
having to check each tuple for nullness when the dump restores the
primary key creation.
pg_upgrading from an older release requires a somewhat brittle procedure
to create a constraint state that matches what would be created if the
database were being created fresh in Postgres 17. I have tested all the
scenarios I could think of, and it works correctly as far as I can tell,
but I could have neglected weird cases.
This patch has been very long in the making. The first patch was
written by Bernd Helmle in 2010 to add a new pg_constraint.contype value
('n'), which I (Álvaro) then hijacked in 2011 and 2012, until that one
was killed by the realization that we ought to use contype='c' instead:
manufactured CHECK constraints. However, later SQL standard
development, as well as nonobvious emergent properties of that design
(mostly, failure to distinguish them from "normal" CHECK constraints as
well as the performance implication of having to test the CHECK
expression) led us to reconsider this choice, so now the current
implementation uses contype='n' again. During Postgres 16 this had
already been introduced by commit e056c557aef4, but there were some
problems mainly with the pg_upgrade procedure that couldn't be fixed in
reasonable time, so it was reverted.
In 2016 Vitaly Burovoy also worked on this feature[1] but found no
consensus for his proposed approach, which was claimed to be closer to
the letter of the standard, requiring an additional pg_attribute column
to track the OID of the not-null constraint for that column.
[1] https://postgr.es/m/CAKOSWNkN6HSyatuys8xZxzRCR-KL1OkHS5-b9qd9bf1Rad3PLA@mail.gmail.com
Author: Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Author: Bernd Helmle <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <[email protected]>
|
|
Previously we only allowed unique B-tree constraints on partitions
(and only if the constraint included all the partition keys). But we
could allow exclusion constraints with the same restriction. We also
require that those columns be compared for equality, not something
like &&.
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ronan Dunklau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/[email protected]
|
|
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files.
This set of diffs is a bit larger than typical. We've updated to
pg_bsd_indent 2.1.2, which properly indents variable declarations that
have multi-line initialization expressions (the continuation lines are
now indented one tab stop). We've also updated to perltidy version
20230309 and changed some of its settings, which reduces its desire to
add whitespace to lines to make assignments etc. line up. Going
forward, that should make for fewer random-seeming changes to existing
code.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
CREATE SCHEMA AUTHORIZATION with appended schema elements can lead to
crashes when comparing the schema name of the query with the schemas
used in the qualification of some clauses in the elements' queries.
The origin of the problem is that the transformation routine for the
elements listed in a CREATE SCHEMA query uses as new, expected, schema
name the one listed in CreateSchemaStmt itself. However, depending on
the query, CreateSchemaStmt.schemaname may be NULL, being computed
instead from the role specification of the query given by the
AUTHORIZATION clause, that could be either:
- A user name string, with the new schema name being set to the same
value as the role given.
- Guessed from CURRENT_ROLE, SESSION_ROLE or CURRENT_ROLE, with a new
schema name computed from the security context where CREATE SCHEMA is
running.
Regression tests are added for CREATE SCHEMA with some appended elements
(some of them with schema qualifications), covering also some role
specification patterns.
While on it, this simplifies the context structure used during the
transformation of the elements listed in a CREATE SCHEMA query by
removing the fields for the role specification and the role type. They
were not used, and for the role specification this could be confusing as
the schema name may by extracted from that at the beginning of
CreateSchemaCommand().
This issue exists for a long time, so backpatch down to all the versions
supported.
Reported-by: Song Hongyu
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
|
|
This reverts commit e056c557aef4 and minor later fixes thereof.
There's a few problems in this new feature -- most notably regarding
pg_upgrade behavior, but others as well. This new feature is not in any
way critical on its own, so instead of scrambling to fix it we revert it
and try again in early 17 with these issues in mind.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
process_notnull_constraints should be set to false until we discover a NOT
NULL column.
Discovered while running Valgrind.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvoMyiZVi1KW5WVdqMRzWsWkD3F7n6QD+BbAO6WTeAWsUQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
We now create pg_constaint rows for NOT NULL constraints with
contype='n'.
We propagate these constraints during operations such as adding
inheritance relationships, creating and attaching partitions, creating
tables LIKE other tables. We mostly follow the well-known rules of
conislocal and coninhcount that we have for CHECK constraints, with some
adaptations; for example, as opposed to CHECK constraints, we don't
match NOT NULL ones by name when descending a hierarchy to alter it;
instead we match by column number. This means we don't require the
constraint names to be identical across a hierarchy.
For now, we omit them from system catalogs. Maybe this is worth
reconsidering. We don't support NOT VALID nor DEFERRABLE clauses
either; these can be added as separate features later (this patch is
already large and complicated enough.)
This has been very long in the making. The first patch was written by
Bernd Helmle in 2010 to add a new pg_constraint.contype value ('n'),
which I (Álvaro) then hijacked in 2011 and 2012, until that one was
killed by the realization that we ought to use contype='c' instead:
manufactured CHECK constraints. However, later SQL standard
development, as well as nonobvious emergent properties of that design
(mostly, failure to distinguish them from "normal" CHECK constraints as
well as the performance implication of having to test the CHECK
expression) led us to reconsider this choice, so now the current
implementation uses contype='n' again.
In 2016 Vitaly Burovoy also worked on this feature[1] but found no
consensus for his proposed approach, which was claimed to be closer to
the letter of the standard, requiring additional pg_attribute columns to
track the OID of the NOT NULL constraint for that column.
[1] https://postgr.es/m/CAKOSWNkN6HSyatuys8xZxzRCR-KL1OkHS5-b9qd9bf1Rad3PLA@mail.gmail.com
Author: Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Author: Bernd Helmle <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACA0E642A0267EDA387AF2B%40%5B172.26.14.62%5D
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKOSWNkN6HSyatuys8xZxzRCR-KL1OkHS5-b9qd9bf1Rad3PLA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
When calling generateSerialExtraStmts(), we would pass in the
constraint->options. In some cases, generateSerialExtraStmts() would
modify the referenced List to remove elements from it, but doing so is
invalid without assigning the list back to all variables that point to it.
In the particular reported problem case, the List became empty, in which
cases it became NIL, but the passed in constraint->options didn't get to
find out about that and was left pointing to free'd memory.
To fix this, just perform a list_copy() inside generateSerialExtraStmts().
We could just do a list_copy() just before we perform the delete from the
list, however, that seems less robust. Let's make sure the generated
CreateSeqStmt gets a completely different copy of the list to be safe.
Bug: #17879
Reported-by: Fei Changhong
Diagnosed-by: Fei Changhong
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11, all supported versions
|
|
When extracting an attr from a cached tuple in the syscache with
SysCacheGetAttr the isnull parameter must be checked in case the
attr cannot be NULL. For cases when this is known beforehand, a
wrapper is introduced which perform the errorhandling internally
on behalf of the caller, invoking an elog in case of a NULL attr.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
In both partitioning and traditional inheritance, require child
columns to be GENERATED if and only if their parent(s) are.
Formerly we allowed the case of an inherited column being
GENERATED when its parent isn't, but that results in inconsistent
behavior: the column can be directly updated through an UPDATE
on the parent table, leading to it containing a user-supplied
value that might not match the generation expression. This also
fixes an oversight that we enforced partition-key-columns-can't-
be-GENERATED against parent tables, but not against child tables
that were dynamically attached to them.
Also, remove the restriction that the child's generation expression
be equivalent to the parent's. In the wake of commit 3f7836ff6,
there doesn't seem to be any reason that we need that restriction,
since generation expressions are always computed per-table anyway.
By removing this, we can also allow a child to merge multiple
inheritance parents with inconsistent generation expressions, by
overriding them with its own expression, much as we've long allowed
for DEFAULT expressions.
Since we're rejecting a case that we used to accept, this doesn't
seem like a back-patchable change. Given the lack of field
complaints about the inconsistent behavior, it's likely that no
one is doing this anyway, but we won't change it in minor releases.
Amit Langote and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
Backpatch-through: 11
|
|
During ALTER TABLE execution, when prep-time handling of subcommands of
certain types determine that execution-time handling requires recursion,
they signal this by changing the subcommand type to a special value.
This can be done in a simpler way by using a separate flag introduced by
commit ec0925c22a3d, so do that.
Catversion bumped. It's not clear to me that ALTER TABLE subcommands
are stored anywhere in catalogs (CREATE FUNCTION rejects it in BEGIN
ATOMIC function bodies), but we do have both write and read support for
them, so be safe.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
|
|
Currently, information about the permissions to be checked on relations
mentioned in a query is stored in their range table entries. So the
executor must scan the entire range table looking for relations that
need to have permissions checked. This can make the permission checking
part of the executor initialization needlessly expensive when many
inheritance children are present in the range range. While the
permissions need not be checked on the individual child relations, the
executor still must visit every range table entry to filter them out.
This commit moves the permission checking information out of the range
table entries into a new plan node called RTEPermissionInfo. Every
top-level (inheritance "root") RTE_RELATION entry in the range table
gets one and a list of those is maintained alongside the range table.
This new list is initialized by the parser when initializing the range
table. The rewriter can add more entries to it as rules/views are
expanded. Finally, the planner combines the lists of the individual
subqueries into one flat list that is passed to the executor for
checking.
To make it quick to find the RTEPermissionInfo entry belonging to a
given relation, RangeTblEntry gets a new Index field 'perminfoindex'
that stores the corresponding RTEPermissionInfo's index in the query's
list of the latter.
ExecutorCheckPerms_hook has gained another List * argument; the
signature is now:
typedef bool (*ExecutorCheckPerms_hook_type) (List *rangeTable,
List *rtePermInfos,
bool ereport_on_violation);
The first argument is no longer used by any in-core uses of the hook,
but we leave it in place because there may be other implementations that
do. Implementations should likely scan the rtePermInfos list to
determine which operations to allow or deny.
Author: Amit Langote <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqGjJDmUhDSfv-U2qhKJjt9ST7Xh9JXC_irsAQ1TAUsJYg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
When it's given as true, return a 0 in the position of the missing
column rather than raising an error.
This is currently unused, but it allows us to reimplement column
permission checking in a subsequent commit. It seems worth breaking
into a separate commit because it affects unrelated code.
Author: Amit Langote <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqFfiai=qBxPDTjaio_ZcaqUKh+FC=prESrB8ogZgFNNNQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Instead of dozens of mostly-duplicate pg_foo_aclcheck() functions,
write one common function object_aclcheck() that can handle almost all
of them. We already have all the information we need, such as which
system catalog corresponds to which catalog table and which column is
the ACL column.
There are a few pg_foo_aclcheck() that don't work via the generic
function and have special APIs, so those stay as is.
I also changed most pg_foo_aclmask() functions to static functions,
since they are not used outside of aclchk.c.
Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/[email protected]
|
|
These don't offer anything over plain Assert, and their usage had
already been declared obsolescent.
Author: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20221009210148.GA900071@nathanxps13
|
|
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in optimizer, parser,
utility, libpq, and "commands" code, as well as in remaining library
code. Do the same for all code related to frontend programs (with the
exception of pg_dump/pg_dumpall related code).
Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will handle
ecpg and pg_dump/pg_dumpall.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Previously, if an extension script did CREATE OR REPLACE and there was
an existing object not belonging to the extension, it would overwrite
the object and adopt it into the extension. This is problematic, first
because the overwrite is probably unintentional, and second because we
didn't change the object's ownership. Thus a hostile user could create
an object in advance of an expected CREATE EXTENSION command, and would
then have ownership rights on an extension object, which could be
modified for trojan-horse-type attacks.
Hence, forbid CREATE OR REPLACE of an existing object unless it already
belongs to the extension. (Note that we've always forbidden replacing
an object that belongs to some other extension; only the behavior for
previously-free-standing objects changes here.)
For the same reason, also fail CREATE IF NOT EXISTS when there is
an existing object that doesn't belong to the extension.
Our thanks to Sven Klemm for reporting this problem.
Security: CVE-2022-2625
|
