summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/access/gist/gistget.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-03-11Show index search count in EXPLAIN ANALYZE, take 2.Peter Geoghegan
Expose the count of index searches/index descents in EXPLAIN ANALYZE's output for index scan/index-only scan/bitmap index scan nodes. This information is particularly useful with scans that use ScalarArrayOp quals, where the number of index searches can be unpredictable due to implementation details that interact with physical index characteristics (at least with nbtree SAOP scans, since Postgres 17 commit 5bf748b8). The information shown also provides useful context when EXPLAIN ANALYZE runs a plan with an index scan node that successfully applied the skip scan optimization (set to be added to nbtree by an upcoming patch). The instrumentation works by teaching all index AMs to increment a new nsearches counter whenever a new index search begins. The counter is incremented at exactly the same point that index AMs already increment the pg_stat_*_indexes.idx_scan counter (we're counting the same event, but at the scan level rather than the relation level). Parallel queries have workers copy their local counter struct into shared memory when an index scan node ends -- even when it isn't a parallel aware scan node. An earlier version of this patch that only worked with parallel aware scans became commit 5ead85fb (though that was quickly reverted by commit d00107cd following "debug_parallel_query=regress" buildfarm failures). Our approach doesn't match the approach used when tracking other index scan related costs (e.g., "Rows Removed by Filter:"). It is comparable to the approach used in similar cases involving costs that are only readily accessible inside an access method, not from the executor proper (e.g., "Heap Blocks:" output for a Bitmap Heap Scan, which was recently enhanced to show per-worker costs by commit 5a1e6df3, using essentially the same scheme as the one used here). It is necessary for index AMs to have direct responsibility for maintaining the new counter, since the counter might need to be incremented multiple times per amgettuple call (or per amgetbitmap call). But it is also necessary for the executor proper to manage the shared memory now used to transfer each worker's counter struct to the leader. Author: Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Masahiro Ikeda <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matthias van de Meent <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkRqvaqR2CTNqTZP0z6FuL4-3ED6eQB0yx38XBNj1v-4Q@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=PKR6rB7qbx+Vnd7eqeB5VTcrW=iJvAsTsKbdG+kW_UA@mail.gmail.com
2025-03-05Revert "Show index search count in EXPLAIN ANALYZE."Peter Geoghegan
This reverts commit 5ead85fbc81162ab1594f656b036a22e814f96b3. This commit shows test failures with debug_parallel_query=regress. The underlying issue needs to be debugged, so revert for now.
2025-03-05Show index search count in EXPLAIN ANALYZE.Peter Geoghegan
Expose the count of index searches/index descents in EXPLAIN ANALYZE's output for index scan nodes. This information is particularly useful with scans that use ScalarArrayOp quals, where the number of index scans isn't predictable in advance (at least not with optimizations like the one added to nbtree by Postgres 17 commit 5bf748b8). It will also be useful when EXPLAIN ANALYZE shows details of an nbtree index scan that uses skip scan optimizations set to be introduced by an upcoming patch. The instrumentation works by teaching index AMs to increment a new nsearches counter whenever a new index search begins. The counter is incremented at exactly the same point that index AMs must already increment the index's pg_stat_*_indexes.idx_scan counter (we're counting the same event, but at the scan level rather than the relation level). The new counter is stored in the scan descriptor (IndexScanDescData), which explain.c reaches by going through the scan node's PlanState. This approach doesn't match the approach used when tracking other index scan specific costs (e.g., "Rows Removed by Filter:"). It is similar to the approach used in other cases where we must track costs that are only readily accessible inside an access method, and not from the executor (e.g., "Heap Blocks:" output for a Bitmap Heap Scan). It is inherently necessary to maintain a counter that can be incremented multiple times during a single amgettuple call (or amgetbitmap call), and directly exposing PlanState.instrument to index access methods seems unappealing. Author: Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Masahiro Ikeda <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matthias van de Meent <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=PKR6rB7qbx+Vnd7eqeB5VTcrW=iJvAsTsKbdG+kW_UA@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkRqvaqR2CTNqTZP0z6FuL4-3ED6eQB0yx38XBNj1v-4Q@mail.gmail.com
2025-01-01Update copyright for 2025Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: 13
2024-03-04Remove unused #include's from backend .c filesPeter Eisentraut
as determined by include-what-you-use (IWYU) While IWYU also suggests to *add* a bunch of #include's (which is its main purpose), this patch does not do that. In some cases, a more specific #include replaces another less specific one. Some manual adjustments of the automatic result: - IWYU currently doesn't know about includes that provide global variable declarations (like -Wmissing-variable-declarations), so those includes are being kept manually. - All includes for port(ability) headers are being kept for now, to play it safe. - No changes of catalog/pg_foo.h to catalog/pg_foo_d.h, to keep the patch from exploding in size. Note that this patch touches just *.c files, so nothing declared in header files changes in hidden ways. As a small example, in src/backend/access/transam/rmgr.c, some IWYU pragma annotations are added to handle a special case there. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/af837490-6b2f-46df-ba05-37ea6a6653fc%40eisentraut.org
2024-01-04Update copyright for 2024Bruce Momjian
Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected] Backpatch-through: 12
2023-09-05Remove the "snapshot too old" feature.Thomas Munro
Remove the old_snapshot_threshold setting and mechanism for producing the error "snapshot too old", originally added by commit 848ef42b. Unfortunately it had a number of known problems in terms of correctness and performance, mostly reported by Andres in the course of his work on snapshot scalability. We agreed to remove it, after a long period without an active plan to fix it. This is certainly a desirable feature, and someone might propose a new or improved implementation in the future. Reported-by: Andres Freund <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACG%3DezYV%2BEvO135fLRdVn-ZusfVsTY6cH1OZqWtezuEYH6ciQA%40mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200401064008.qob7bfnnbu4w5cw4%40alap3.anarazel.de Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BTgmoY%3Daqf0zjTD%2B3dUWYkgMiNDegDLFjo%2B6ze%3DWtpik%2B3XqA%40mail.gmail.com
2023-05-19Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.Tom Lane
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files. This set of diffs is a bit larger than typical. We've updated to pg_bsd_indent 2.1.2, which properly indents variable declarations that have multi-line initialization expressions (the continuation lines are now indented one tab stop). We've also updated to perltidy version 20230309 and changed some of its settings, which reduces its desire to add whitespace to lines to make assignments etc. line up. Going forward, that should make for fewer random-seeming changes to existing code. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
2023-01-02Update copyright for 2023Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: 11
2022-01-08Update copyright for 2022Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: 10
2021-01-02Update copyright for 2021Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: 9.5
2020-01-01Update copyrights for 2020Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4
2019-12-26Revert "Rename files and headers related to index AM"Michael Paquier
This follows multiple complains from Peter Geoghegan, Andres Freund and Alvaro Herrera that this issue ought to be dug more before actually happening, if it happens. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
2019-12-25Rename files and headers related to index AMMichael Paquier
The following renaming is done so as source files related to index access methods are more consistent with table access methods (the original names used for index AMs ware too generic, and could be confused as including features related to table AMs): - amapi.h -> indexam.h. - amapi.c -> indexamapi.c. Here we have an equivalent with backend/access/table/tableamapi.c. - amvalidate.c -> indexamvalidate.c. - amvalidate.h -> indexamvalidate.h. - genam.c -> indexgenam.c. - genam.h -> indexgenam.h. This has been discussed during the development of v12 when table AM was worked on, but the renaming never happened. Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Fabien Coelho, Julien Rouhaud Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
2019-11-12Make the order of the header file includes consistent in backend modules.Amit Kapila
Similar to commits 7e735035f2 and dddf4cdc33, this commit makes the order of header file inclusion consistent for backend modules. In the passing, removed a couple of duplicate inclusions. Author: Vignesh C Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh and Amit Kapila Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2Sznv8RR6Ex-iJO6xAdsxgWhCoETkaYX=+9DW3q0QCfA@mail.gmail.com
2019-09-19Improve handling of NULLs in KNN-GiST and KNN-SP-GiSTAlexander Korotkov
This commit improves subject in two ways: * It removes ugliness of 02f90879e7, which stores distance values and null flags in two separate arrays after GISTSearchItem struct. Instead we pack both distance value and null flag in IndexOrderByDistance struct. Alignment overhead should be negligible, because we typically deal with at most few "col op const" expressions in ORDER BY clause. * It fixes handling of "col op NULL" expression in KNN-SP-GiST. Now, these expression are not passed to support functions, which can't deal with them. Instead, NULL result is implicitly assumed. It future we may decide to teach support functions to deal with NULL arguments, but current solution is bugfix suitable for backpatch. Reported-by: Nikita Glukhov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/826f57ee-afc7-8977-c44c-6111d18b02ec%40postgrespro.ru Author: Nikita Glukhov Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov Backpatch-through: 9.4
2019-09-08Fix handling of NULL distances in KNN-GiSTAlexander Korotkov
In order to implement NULL LAST semantic GiST previously assumed distance to the NULL value to be Inf. However, our distance functions can return Inf and NaN for non-null values. In such cases, NULL LAST semantic appears to be broken. This commit fixes that by introducing separate array of null flags for distances. Backpatch to all supported versions. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsNvNdA0DBS%2BwMpFrgwT6C3-q50sFVGLSiuWnV3FqOJuQ%40mail.gmail.com Author: Alexander Korotkov Backpatch-through: 9.4
2019-08-05Fix inconsistencies and typos in the tree, take 9Michael Paquier
This addresses more issues with code comments, variable names and unreferenced variables. Author: Alexander Lakhin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
2019-07-24Refactor checks for deleted GiST pages.Heikki Linnakangas
The explicit check in gistScanPage() isn't currently really necessary, as a deleted page is always empty, so the loop would fall through without doing anything, anyway. But it's a marginal optimization, and it gives a nice place to attach a comment to explain how it works. Backpatch to v12, where GiST page deletion was introduced. Reviewed-by: Andrey Borodin Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/835A15A5-F1B4-4446-A711-BF48357EB602%40yandex-team.ru
2019-07-22Fix inconsistencies and typos in the treeMichael Paquier
This is numbered take 7, and addresses a set of issues with code comments, variable names and unreferenced variables. Author: Alexander Lakhin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
2019-03-11tableam: Add and use scan APIs.Andres Freund
Too allow table accesses to be not directly dependent on heap, several new abstractions are needed. Specifically: 1) Heap scans need to be generalized into table scans. Do this by introducing TableScanDesc, which will be the "base class" for individual AMs. This contains the AM independent fields from HeapScanDesc. The previous heap_{beginscan,rescan,endscan} et al. have been replaced with a table_ version. There's no direct replacement for heap_getnext(), as that returned a HeapTuple, which is undesirable for a other AMs. Instead there's table_scan_getnextslot(). But note that heap_getnext() lives on, it's still used widely to access catalog tables. This is achieved by new scan_begin, scan_end, scan_rescan, scan_getnextslot callbacks. 2) The portion of parallel scans that's shared between backends need to be able to do so without the user doing per-AM work. To achieve that new parallelscan_{estimate, initialize, reinitialize} callbacks are introduced, which operate on a new ParallelTableScanDesc, which again can be subclassed by AMs. As it is likely that several AMs are going to be block oriented, block oriented callbacks that can be shared between such AMs are provided and used by heap. table_block_parallelscan_{estimate, intiialize, reinitialize} as callbacks, and table_block_parallelscan_{nextpage, init} for use in AMs. These operate on a ParallelBlockTableScanDesc. 3) Index scans need to be able to access tables to return a tuple, and there needs to be state across individual accesses to the heap to store state like buffers. That's now handled by introducing a sort-of-scan IndexFetchTable, which again is intended to be subclassed by individual AMs (for heap IndexFetchHeap). The relevant callbacks for an AM are index_fetch_{end, begin, reset} to create the necessary state, and index_fetch_tuple to retrieve an indexed tuple. Note that index_fetch_tuple implementations need to be smarter than just blindly fetching the tuples for AMs that have optimizations similar to heap's HOT - the currently alive tuple in the update chain needs to be fetched if appropriate. Similar to table_scan_getnextslot(), it's undesirable to continue to return HeapTuples. Thus index_fetch_heap (might want to rename that later) now accepts a slot as an argument. Core code doesn't have a lot of call sites performing index scans without going through the systable_* API (in contrast to loads of heap_getnext calls and working directly with HeapTuples). Index scans now store the result of a search in IndexScanDesc->xs_heaptid, rather than xs_ctup->t_self. As the target is not generally a HeapTuple anymore that seems cleaner. To be able to sensible adapt code to use the above, two further callbacks have been introduced: a) slot_callbacks returns a TupleTableSlotOps* suitable for creating slots capable of holding a tuple of the AMs type. table_slot_callbacks() and table_slot_create() are based upon that, but have additional logic to deal with views, foreign tables, etc. While this change could have been done separately, nearly all the call sites that needed to be adapted for the rest of this commit also would have been needed to be adapted for table_slot_callbacks(), making separation not worthwhile. b) tuple_satisfies_snapshot checks whether the tuple in a slot is currently visible according to a snapshot. That's required as a few places now don't have a buffer + HeapTuple around, but a slot (which in heap's case internally has that information). Additionally a few infrastructure changes were needed: I) SysScanDesc, as used by systable_{beginscan, getnext} et al. now internally uses a slot to keep track of tuples. While systable_getnext() still returns HeapTuples, and will so for the foreseeable future, the index API (see 1) above) now only deals with slots. The remainder, and largest part, of this commit is then adjusting all scans in postgres to use the new APIs. Author: Andres Freund, Haribabu Kommi, Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected] https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
2019-03-10Support for INCLUDE attributes in GiST indexesAlexander Korotkov
Similarly to B-tree, GiST index access method gets support of INCLUDE attributes. These attributes aren't used for tree navigation and aren't present in non-leaf pages. But they are present in leaf pages and can be fetched during index-only scan. The point of having INCLUDE attributes in GiST indexes is slightly different from the point of having them in B-tree. The main point of INCLUDE attributes in B-tree is to define UNIQUE constraint over part of attributes enabled for index-only scan. In GiST the main point of INCLUDE attributes is to use index-only scan for attributes, whose data types don't have GiST opclasses. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/73A1A452-AD5F-40D4-BD61-978622FF75C1%40yandex-team.ru Author: Andrey Borodin, with small changes by me Reviewed-by: Andreas Karlsson
2019-01-02Update copyright for 2019Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.4
2018-09-18Add support for nearest-neighbor (KNN) searches to SP-GiSTAlexander Korotkov
Currently, KNN searches were supported only by GiST. SP-GiST also capable to support them. This commit implements that support. SP-GiST scan stack is replaced with queue, which serves as stack if no ordering is specified. KNN support is provided for three SP-GIST opclasses: quad_point_ops, kd_point_ops and poly_ops (catversion is bumped). Some common parts between GiST and SP-GiST KNNs are extracted into separate functions. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/570825e8-47d0-4732-2bf6-88d67d2d51c8%40postgrespro.ru Author: Nikita Glukhov, Alexander Korotkov based on GSoC work by Vlad Sterzhanov Review: Andrey Borodin, Alexander Korotkov
2018-07-29Provide separate header file for built-in float typesTomas Vondra
Some data types under adt/ have separate header files, but most simple ones do not, and their public functions are defined in builtins.h. As the patches improving geometric types will require making additional functions public, this seems like a good opportunity to create a header for floats types. Commit 1acf757255 made _cmp functions public to solve NaN issues locally for GiST indexes. This patch reworks it in favour of a more widely applicable API. The API uses inline functions, as they are easier to use compared to macros, and avoid double-evaluation hazards. Author: Emre Hasegeli Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAE2gYzxF7-5djV6-cEvqQu-fNsnt%3DEqbOURx7ZDg%2BVv6ZMTWbg%40mail.gmail.com
2018-03-27Add predicate locking for GiSTTeodor Sigaev
Add page-level predicate locking, due to gist's code organization, patch seems close to trivial: add check before page changing, add predicate lock before page scanning. Although choosing right place to check is not simple: it should not be called during index build, it should support insertion of new downlink and so on. Author: Shubham Barai with editorization by me and Alexander Korotkov Reviewed by: Alexander Korotkov, Andrey Borodin, me Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CALxAEPtdcANpw5ePU3LvnTP8HCENFw6wygupQAyNBgD-sG3h0g@mail.gmail.com
2018-01-09Change some bogus PageGetLSN calls to BufferGetLSNAtomicAlvaro Herrera
As src/backend/access/transam/README says, PageGetLSN may only be called by processes holding either exclusive lock on buffer, or a shared lock on buffer plus buffer header lock. Therefore any place that only holds a shared buffer lock must use BufferGetLSNAtomic instead of PageGetLSN, which internally obtains buffer header lock prior to reading the LSN. A few callsites failed to comply with this rule. This was detected by running all tests under a new (not committed) assertion that verifies PageGetLSN locking contract. All but one of the callsites that failed the assertion are fixed by this patch. Remaining callsites were inspected manually and determined not to need any change. The exception (unfixed callsite) is in TestForOldSnapshot, which only has a Page argument, making it impossible to access the corresponding Buffer from it. Fixing that seems a much larger patch that will have to be done separately; and that's just as well, since it was only introduced in 9.6 and other bugs are much older. Some of these bugs are ancient; backpatch all the way back to 9.3. Authors: Jacob Champion, Asim Praveen, Ashwin Agrawal Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABAq_6GXgQDVu3u12mK9O5Xt5abBZWQ0V40LZCE+oUf95XyNFg@mail.gmail.com
2018-01-03Update copyright for 2018Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.3
2017-11-08Change TRUE/FALSE to true/falsePeter Eisentraut
The lower case spellings are C and C++ standard and are used in most parts of the PostgreSQL sources. The upper case spellings are only used in some files/modules. So standardize on the standard spellings. The APIs for ICU, Perl, and Windows define their own TRUE and FALSE, so those are left as is when using those APIs. In code comments, we use the lower-case spelling for the C concepts and keep the upper-case spelling for the SQL concepts. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
2017-09-20Allow no-op GiST support functions to be omitted.Tom Lane
There are common use-cases in which the compress and/or decompress functions can be omitted, with the result being that we make no data transformation when storing or retrieving index values. Previously, you had to provide a no-op function anyway, but this patch allows such opclass support functions to be omitted. Furthermore, if the compress function is omitted, then the core code knows that the stored representation is the same as the original data. This means we can allow index-only scans without requiring a fetch function to be provided either. Previously you had to provide a no-op fetch function if you wanted IOS to work. This reportedly provides a small performance benefit in such cases, but IMO the real reason for doing it is just to reduce the amount of useless boilerplate code that has to be written for GiST opclasses. Andrey Borodin, reviewed by Dmitriy Sarafannikov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJEAwVELVx9gYscpE=Be6iJxvdW5unZ_LkcAaVNSeOwvdwtD=A@mail.gmail.com
2017-06-21Phase 2 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane
Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected] Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
2017-05-04Fix pfree-of-already-freed-tuple when rescanning a GiST index-only scan.Tom Lane
GiST's getNextNearest() function attempts to pfree the previously-returned tuple if any (that is, scan->xs_hitup in HEAD, or scan->xs_itup in older branches). However, if we are rescanning a plan node after ending a previous scan early, those tuple pointers could be pointing to garbage, because they would be pointing into the scan's pageDataCxt or queueCxt which has been reset. In a debug build this reliably results in a crash, although I think it might sometimes accidentally fail to fail in production builds. To fix, clear the pointer field anyplace we reset a context it might be pointing into. This may be overkill --- I think probably only the queueCxt case is involved in this bug, so that resetting in gistrescan() would be sufficient --- but dangling pointers are generally bad news, so let's avoid them. Another plausible answer might be to just not bother with the pfree in getNextNearest(). The reconstructed tuples would go away anyway in the context resets, and I'm far from convinced that freeing them a bit earlier really saves anything meaningful. I'll stick with the original logic in this patch, but if we find more problems in the same area we should consider that approach. Per bug #14641 from Denis Smirnov. Back-patch to 9.5 where this logic was introduced. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
2017-02-27Allow index AMs to return either HeapTuple or IndexTuple format during IOS.Tom Lane
Previously, only IndexTuple format was supported for the output data of an index-only scan. This is fine for btree, which is just returning a verbatim index tuple anyway. It's not so fine for SP-GiST, which can return reconstructed data that's much larger than a page. To fix, extend the index AM API so that index-only scan data can be returned in either HeapTuple or IndexTuple format. There's other ways we could have done it, but this way avoids an API break for index AMs that aren't concerned with the issue, and it costs little except a couple more fields in IndexScanDescs. I changed both GiST and SP-GiST to use the HeapTuple method. I'm not very clear on whether GiST can reconstruct data that's too large for an IndexTuple, but that seems possible, and it's not much of a code change to fix. Per a complaint from Vik Fearing. Reviewed by Jason Li. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
2017-01-03Update copyright via script for 2017Bruce Momjian
2016-06-09pgindent run for 9.6Robert Haas
2016-04-20Revert no-op changes to BufferGetPage()Kevin Grittner
The reverted changes were intended to force a choice of whether any newly-added BufferGetPage() calls needed to be accompanied by a test of the snapshot age, to support the "snapshot too old" feature. Such an accompanying test is needed in about 7% of the cases, where the page is being used as part of a scan rather than positioning for other purposes (such as DML or vacuuming). The additional effort required for back-patching, and the doubt whether the intended benefit would really be there, have indicated it is best just to rely on developers to do the right thing based on comments and existing usage, as we do with many other conventions. This change should have little or no effect on generated executable code. Motivated by the back-patching pain of Tom Lane and Robert Haas
2016-04-08Add the "snapshot too old" featureKevin Grittner
This feature is controlled by a new old_snapshot_threshold GUC. A value of -1 disables the feature, and that is the default. The value of 0 is just intended for testing. Above that it is the number of minutes a snapshot can reach before pruning and vacuum are allowed to remove dead tuples which the snapshot would otherwise protect. The xmin associated with a transaction ID does still protect dead tuples. A connection which is using an "old" snapshot does not get an error unless it accesses a page modified recently enough that it might not be able to produce accurate results. This is similar to the Oracle feature, and we use the same SQLSTATE and error message for compatibility.
2016-04-08Modify BufferGetPage() to prepare for "snapshot too old" featureKevin Grittner
This patch is a no-op patch which is intended to reduce the chances of failures of omission once the functional part of the "snapshot too old" patch goes in. It adds parameters for snapshot, relation, and an enum to specify whether the snapshot age check needs to be done for the page at this point. This initial patch passes NULL for the first two new parameters and BGP_NO_SNAPSHOT_TEST for the third. The follow-on patch will change the places where the test needs to be made.
2016-01-19Fix assorted inconsistencies in GiST opclass support function declarations.Tom Lane
The conventions specified by the GiST SGML documentation were widely ignored. For example, the strategy-number argument for "consistent" and "distance" functions is specified to be a smallint, but most of the built-in support functions declared it as an integer, and for that matter the core code passed it using Int32GetDatum not Int16GetDatum. None of that makes any real difference at runtime, but it's quite confusing for newcomers to the code, and it makes it very hard to write an amvalidate() function that checks support function signatures. So let's try to instill some consistency here. Another similar issue is that the "query" argument is not of a single well-defined type, but could have different types depending on the strategy (corresponding to search operators with different righthand-side argument types). Some of the functions threw up their hands and declared the query argument as being of "internal" type, which surely isn't right ("any" would have been more appropriate); but the majority position seemed to be to declare it as being of the indexed data type, corresponding to a search operator with both input types the same. So I've specified a convention that that's what to do always. Also, the result of the "union" support function actually must be of the index's storage type, but the documentation suggested declaring it to return "internal", and some of the functions followed that. Standardize on telling the truth, instead. Similarly, standardize on declaring the "same" function's inputs as being of the storage type, not "internal". Also, somebody had forgotten to add the "recheck" argument to both the documentation of the "distance" support function and all of their SQL declarations, even though the C code was happily using that argument. Clean that up too. Fix up some other omissions in the docs too, such as documenting that union's second input argument is vestigial. So far as the errors in core function declarations go, we can just fix pg_proc.h and bump catversion. Adjusting the erroneous declarations in contrib modules is more debatable: in principle any change in those scripts should involve an extension version bump, which is a pain. However, since these changes are purely cosmetic and make no functional difference, I think we can get away without doing that.
2016-01-18Restructure index access method API to hide most of it at the C level.Tom Lane
This patch reduces pg_am to just two columns, a name and a handler function. All the data formerly obtained from pg_am is now provided in a C struct returned by the handler function. This is similar to the designs we've adopted for FDWs and tablesample methods. There are multiple advantages. For one, the index AM's support functions are now simple C functions, making them faster to call and much less error-prone, since the C compiler can now check function signatures. For another, this will make it far more practical to define index access methods in installable extensions. A disadvantage is that SQL-level code can no longer see attributes of index AMs; in particular, some of the crosschecks in the opr_sanity regression test are no longer possible from SQL. We've addressed that by adding a facility for the index AM to perform such checks instead. (Much more could be done in that line, but for now we're content if the amvalidate functions more or less replace what opr_sanity used to do.) We might also want to expose some sort of reporting functionality, but this patch doesn't do that. Alexander Korotkov, reviewed by Petr Jelínek, and rather heavily editorialized on by me.
2016-01-02Update copyright for 2016Bruce Momjian
Backpatch certain files through 9.1
2015-09-09Fix oversight in 013ebc0a7b7ea9c1b1ab7a3d4dd75ea121ea8ba7 commitTeodor Sigaev
Declaration of varibale inside ÓÝ×Õ
2015-09-09Microvacuum for GISTTeodor Sigaev
Mark index tuple as dead if it's pointed by kill_prior_tuple during ordinary (search) scan and remove it during insert process if there is no enough space for new tuple to insert. This improves select performance because index will not return tuple marked as dead and improves insert performance because it reduces number of page split. Anastasia Lubennikova <[email protected]> with minor editorialization by me
2015-05-23Still more fixes for lossy-GiST-distance-functions patch.Tom Lane
Fix confusion in documentation, substantial memory leakage if float8 or float4 are pass-by-reference, and assorted comments that were obsoleted by commit 98edd617f3b62a02cb2df9b418fcc4ece45c7ec0.
2015-05-15Fix datatype confusion with the new lossy GiST distance functions.Heikki Linnakangas
We can only support a lossy distance function when the distance function's datatype is comparable with the original ordering operator's datatype. The distance function always returns a float8, so we are limited to float8, and float4 (by a hard-coded cast of the float8 to float4). In light of this limitation, it seems like a good idea to have a separate 'recheck' flag for the ORDER BY expressions, so that if you have a non-lossy distance function, it still works with lossy quals. There are cases like that with the build-in or contrib opclasses, but it's plausible. There was a hidden assumption that the ORDER BY values returned by GiST match the original ordering operator's return type, but there are plenty of examples where that's not true, e.g. in btree_gist and pg_trgm. As long as the distance function is not lossy, we can tolerate that and just not return the distance to the executor (or rather, always return NULL). The executor doesn't need the distances if there are no lossy results. There was another little bug: the recheck variable was not initialized before calling the distance function. That revealed the bigger issue, as the executor tried to reorder tuples that didn't need reordering, and that failed because of the datatype mismatch.
2015-05-15Allow GiST distance function to return merely a lower-bound.Heikki Linnakangas
The distance function can now set *recheck = false, like index quals. The executor will then re-check the ORDER BY expressions, and use a queue to reorder the results on the fly. This makes it possible to do kNN-searches on polygons and circles, which don't store the exact value in the index, but just a bounding box. Alexander Korotkov and me
2015-03-26Add support for index-only scans in GiST.Heikki Linnakangas
This adds a new GiST opclass method, 'fetch', which is used to reconstruct the original Datum from the value stored in the index. Also, the 'canreturn' index AM interface function gains a new 'attno' argument. That makes it possible to use index-only scans on a multi-column index where some of the opclasses support index-only scans but some do not. This patch adds support in the box and point opclasses. Other opclasses can added later as follow-on patches (btree_gist would be particularly interesting). Anastasia Lubennikova, with additional fixes and modifications by me.
2015-01-06Update copyright for 2015Bruce Momjian
Backpatch certain files through 9.0
2014-12-22Use a pairing heap for the priority queue in kNN-GiST searches.Heikki Linnakangas
This performs slightly better, uses less memory, and needs slightly less code in GiST, than the Red-Black tree previously used. Reviewed by Peter Geoghegan
2014-05-06pgindent run for 9.4Bruce Momjian
This includes removing tabs after periods in C comments, which was applied to back branches, so this change should not effect backpatching.