diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/src')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/src/sgml/ref/pgtesttiming.sgml | 279 |
1 files changed, 93 insertions, 186 deletions
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgtesttiming.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgtesttiming.sgml index a5eb3aa25e0..1fcdbf7f06e 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgtesttiming.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgtesttiming.sgml @@ -30,11 +30,23 @@ PostgreSQL documentation <title>Description</title> <para> - <application>pg_test_timing</application> is a tool to measure the timing overhead - on your system and confirm that the system time never moves backwards. + <application>pg_test_timing</application> is a tool to measure the + timing overhead on your system and confirm that the system time never + moves backwards. It simply reads the system clock over and over again + as fast as it can for a specified length of time, and then prints + statistics about the observed differences in successive clock readings. + </para> + <para> + Smaller (but not zero) differences are better, since they imply both + more-precise clock hardware and less overhead to collect a clock reading. Systems that are slow to collect timing data can give less accurate <command>EXPLAIN ANALYZE</command> results. </para> + <para> + This tool is also helpful to determine if + the <varname>track_io_timing</varname> configuration parameter is likely + to produce useful results. + </para> </refsect1> <refsect1> @@ -60,6 +72,21 @@ PostgreSQL documentation </varlistentry> <varlistentry> + <term><option>-c <replaceable class="parameter">cutoff</replaceable></option></term> + <term><option>--cutoff=<replaceable class="parameter">cutoff</replaceable></option></term> + <listitem> + <para> + Specifies the cutoff percentage for the list of exact observed + timing durations (that is, the changes in the system clock value + from one reading to the next). The list will end once the running + percentage total reaches or exceeds this value, except that the + largest observed duration will always be printed. The default + cutoff is 99.99. + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + + <varlistentry> <term><option>-V</option></term> <term><option>--version</option></term> <listitem> @@ -92,205 +119,83 @@ PostgreSQL documentation <title>Interpreting Results</title> <para> - Good results will show most (>90%) individual timing calls take less than - one microsecond. Average per loop overhead will be even lower, below 100 - nanoseconds. This example from an Intel i7-860 system using a TSC clock - source shows excellent performance: - -<screen><![CDATA[ -Testing timing overhead for 3 seconds. -Per loop time including overhead: 35.96 ns -Histogram of timing durations: - < us % of total count - 1 96.40465 80435604 - 2 3.59518 2999652 - 4 0.00015 126 - 8 0.00002 13 - 16 0.00000 2 -]]></screen> + The first block of output has four columns, with rows showing a + shifted-by-one log2(ns) histogram of timing durations (that is, the + differences between successive clock readings). This is not the + classic log2(n+1) histogram as it counts zeros separately and then + switches to log2(ns) starting from value 1. </para> - <para> - Note that different units are used for the per loop time than the - histogram. The loop can have resolution within a few nanoseconds (ns), - while the individual timing calls can only resolve down to one microsecond - (us). + The columns are: + <itemizedlist spacing="compact"> + <listitem> + <simpara>nanosecond value that is >= the durations in this + bucket</simpara> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <simpara>percentage of durations in this bucket</simpara> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <simpara>running-sum percentage of durations in this and previous + buckets</simpara> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <simpara>count of durations in this bucket</simpara> + </listitem> + </itemizedlist> </para> - - </refsect2> - <refsect2> - <title>Measuring Executor Timing Overhead</title> - <para> - When the query executor is running a statement using - <command>EXPLAIN ANALYZE</command>, individual operations are timed as well - as showing a summary. The overhead of your system can be checked by - counting rows with the <application>psql</application> program: - -<screen> -CREATE TABLE t AS SELECT * FROM generate_series(1,100000); -\timing -SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t; -EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t; -</screen> + The second block of output goes into more detail, showing the exact + timing differences observed. For brevity this list is cut off when the + running-sum percentage exceeds the user-selectable cutoff value. + However, the largest observed difference is always shown. </para> - <para> - The i7-860 system measured runs the count query in 9.8 ms while - the <command>EXPLAIN ANALYZE</command> version takes 16.6 ms, each - processing just over 100,000 rows. That 6.8 ms difference means the timing - overhead per row is 68 ns, about twice what pg_test_timing estimated it - would be. Even that relatively small amount of overhead is making the fully - timed count statement take almost 70% longer. On more substantial queries, - the timing overhead would be less problematic. + The example results below show that 99.99% of timing loops took between + 8 and 31 nanoseconds, with the worst case somewhere between 32768 and + 65535 nanoseconds. In the second block, we can see that typical loop + time is 16 nanoseconds, and the readings appear to have full nanosecond + precision. </para> - </refsect2> - - <refsect2> - <title>Changing Time Sources</title> <para> - On some newer Linux systems, it's possible to change the clock source used - to collect timing data at any time. A second example shows the slowdown - possible from switching to the slower acpi_pm time source, on the same - system used for the fast results above: - <screen><![CDATA[ -# cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource -tsc hpet acpi_pm -# echo acpi_pm > /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource -# pg_test_timing -Per loop time including overhead: 722.92 ns +Testing timing overhead for 3 seconds. +Per loop time including overhead: 16.40 ns Histogram of timing durations: - < us % of total count - 1 27.84870 1155682 - 2 72.05956 2990371 - 4 0.07810 3241 - 8 0.01357 563 - 16 0.00007 3 + <= ns % of total running % count + 0 0.0000 0.0000 0 + 1 0.0000 0.0000 0 + 3 0.0000 0.0000 0 + 7 0.0000 0.0000 0 + 15 4.5452 4.5452 8313178 + 31 95.4527 99.9979 174581501 + 63 0.0001 99.9981 253 + 127 0.0001 99.9982 165 + 255 0.0000 99.9982 35 + 511 0.0000 99.9982 1 + 1023 0.0013 99.9994 2300 + 2047 0.0004 99.9998 690 + 4095 0.0000 99.9998 9 + 8191 0.0000 99.9998 8 + 16383 0.0002 100.0000 337 + 32767 0.0000 100.0000 2 + 65535 0.0000 100.0000 1 + +Observed timing durations up to 99.9900%: + ns % of total running % count + 15 4.5452 4.5452 8313178 + 16 58.3785 62.9237 106773354 + 17 33.6840 96.6078 61607584 + 18 3.1151 99.7229 5697480 + 19 0.2638 99.9867 482570 + 20 0.0093 99.9960 17054 +... + 38051 0.0000 100.0000 1 ]]></screen> </para> - <para> - In this configuration, the sample <command>EXPLAIN ANALYZE</command> above - takes 115.9 ms. That's 1061 ns of timing overhead, again a small multiple - of what's measured directly by this utility. That much timing overhead - means the actual query itself is only taking a tiny fraction of the - accounted for time, most of it is being consumed in overhead instead. In - this configuration, any <command>EXPLAIN ANALYZE</command> totals involving - many timed operations would be inflated significantly by timing overhead. - </para> - - <para> - FreeBSD also allows changing the time source on the fly, and it logs - information about the timer selected during boot: - -<screen> -# dmesg | grep "Timecounter" -Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 900 -Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 -Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec -Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2531787134 Hz quality 800 -# sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware=TSC -kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-fast -> TSC -</screen> - </para> - - <para> - Other systems may only allow setting the time source on boot. On older - Linux systems the "clock" kernel setting is the only way to make this sort - of change. And even on some more recent ones, the only option you'll see - for a clock source is "jiffies". Jiffies are the older Linux software clock - implementation, which can have good resolution when it's backed by fast - enough timing hardware, as in this example: - -<screen><![CDATA[ -$ cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource -jiffies -$ dmesg | grep time.c -time.c: Using 3.579545 MHz WALL PM GTOD PIT/TSC timer. -time.c: Detected 2400.153 MHz processor. -$ pg_test_timing -Testing timing overhead for 3 seconds. -Per timing duration including loop overhead: 97.75 ns -Histogram of timing durations: - < us % of total count - 1 90.23734 27694571 - 2 9.75277 2993204 - 4 0.00981 3010 - 8 0.00007 22 - 16 0.00000 1 - 32 0.00000 1 -]]></screen></para> - </refsect2> - - <refsect2> - <title>Clock Hardware and Timing Accuracy</title> - - <para> - Collecting accurate timing information is normally done on computers using - hardware clocks with various levels of accuracy. With some hardware the - operating systems can pass the system clock time almost directly to - programs. A system clock can also be derived from a chip that simply - provides timing interrupts, periodic ticks at some known time interval. In - either case, operating system kernels provide a clock source that hides - these details. But the accuracy of that clock source and how quickly it can - return results varies based on the underlying hardware. - </para> - - <para> - Inaccurate time keeping can result in system instability. Test any change - to the clock source very carefully. Operating system defaults are sometimes - made to favor reliability over best accuracy. And if you are using a virtual - machine, look into the recommended time sources compatible with it. Virtual - hardware faces additional difficulties when emulating timers, and there are - often per operating system settings suggested by vendors. - </para> - - <para> - The Time Stamp Counter (TSC) clock source is the most accurate one available - on current generation CPUs. It's the preferred way to track the system time - when it's supported by the operating system and the TSC clock is - reliable. There are several ways that TSC can fail to provide an accurate - timing source, making it unreliable. Older systems can have a TSC clock that - varies based on the CPU temperature, making it unusable for timing. Trying - to use TSC on some older multicore CPUs can give a reported time that's - inconsistent among multiple cores. This can result in the time going - backwards, a problem this program checks for. And even the newest systems - can fail to provide accurate TSC timing with very aggressive power saving - configurations. - </para> - - <para> - Newer operating systems may check for the known TSC problems and switch to a - slower, more stable clock source when they are seen. If your system - supports TSC time but doesn't default to that, it may be disabled for a good - reason. And some operating systems may not detect all the possible problems - correctly, or will allow using TSC even in situations where it's known to be - inaccurate. - </para> - - <para> - The High Precision Event Timer (HPET) is the preferred timer on systems - where it's available and TSC is not accurate. The timer chip itself is - programmable to allow up to 100 nanosecond resolution, but you may not see - that much accuracy in your system clock. - </para> - - <para> - Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) provides a Power - Management (PM) Timer, which Linux refers to as the acpi_pm. The clock - derived from acpi_pm will at best provide 300 nanosecond resolution. - </para> - - <para> - Timers used on older PC hardware include the 8254 Programmable Interval - Timer (PIT), the real-time clock (RTC), the Advanced Programmable Interrupt - Controller (APIC) timer, and the Cyclone timer. These timers aim for - millisecond resolution. - </para> - </refsect2> </refsect1> <refsect1> @@ -298,6 +203,8 @@ Histogram of timing durations: <simplelist type="inline"> <member><xref linkend="sql-explain"/></member> + <member><ulink url="https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Pg_test_timing">Wiki + discussion about timing</ulink></member> </simplelist> </refsect1> </refentry> |