Calculate # of semaphores correctly with --disable-spinlocks.

The old formula didn't take into account that each WAL sender process needs
a spinlock. We had also already exceeded the fixed number of spinlocks
reserved for misc purposes (10). Bump that to 30.

Backpatch to 9.0, where WAL senders were introduced. If I counted correctly,
9.0 had exactly 10 predefined spinlocks, and 9.1 exceeded that, but bump the
limit in 9.0 too because 10 is uncomfortably close to the edge.

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/spin.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/spin.c
index 8dd1c6b8a8f..3d7a8f36a9c 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/spin.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/spin.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include "postgres.h"
 
 #include "miscadmin.h"
+#include "replication/walsender.h"
 #include "storage/lwlock.h"
 #include "storage/spin.h"
 
@@ -50,14 +51,21 @@ SpinlockSemas(void)
 int
 SpinlockSemas(void)
 {
+	int		nsemas;
+
 	/*
 	 * It would be cleaner to distribute this logic into the affected modules,
 	 * similar to the way shmem space estimation is handled.
 	 *
-	 * For now, though, we just need a few spinlocks (10 should be plenty)
-	 * plus one for each LWLock and one for each buffer header.
+	 * For now, though, there are few enough users of spinlocks that we just
+	 * keep the knowledge here.
 	 */
-	return NumLWLocks() + NBuffers + 10;
+	nsemas = NumLWLocks();		/* one for each lwlock */
+	nsemas += NBuffers;			/* one for each buffer header */
+	nsemas += max_wal_senders;	/* one for each wal sender process */
+	nsemas += 30;				/* plus a bunch for other small-scale use */
+
+	return nsemas;
 }
 
 /*