useress
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
English
[edit]Etymology
[edit]Noun
[edit]useress (plural useresses) (rare)
- A female user.
- 1992 May 19, Ron A. 5150 Echeverri, “Re: Some Other Establishment Screwup!”, in alt.cascade (Usenet), message-ID <l1hk41INN7vs@wezea.usc.edu>:
- Ha! Foolish user (useress?)
- 1993 December 1, Oliver Haeuser, “Re: OS2 vs Chicago”, in comp.os.os2.advocacy (Usenet), message-ID <5E3vts5d5T@55.hot.zer.de>:
- This could be true ... but don't forget all the "lower" computers that are still out there. Just today I discovered a machine that still runs under DR DOS 6 and the useress worked with a DOS Wordprocessor, / can you imagine this ???
- 1999 March 12, au...@cam.org, “Re: Security Violation!”, in comp.arch.embedded (Usenet), message-ID <7cb535$8dl$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>:
- This is not really for an embedded forum, but if I may, I'd like to add that as the recent Happy99 virus demonstrated, it is possible to have a PC send EXE files with e-mails without the user knowing about it. Or at least, the common, not too observative user or useress.
- 2000 February 10, Helmut P. Einfalt, “Re: Linux? Why?”, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video (Usenet), message-ID <87v4li$ndn$1@news01.btx.dtag.de>:
- 2002 July 12, Raoul Bönisch, “Re: generating .muttrc”, in mailing.unix.mutt-users (Usenet), message-ID <agmv0v$25rj$1@FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw>:
- Nevertheless that's a nice idea. But I'm afraid using configuration files off the net without checking is a security risk. The users and useresses should really first check the generated config file before using it! Or you should use secure connections to trusted institutions to generate them.