Talk:Reddit
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Name of a Web site. If removed, please fix link at Redditor. Equinox ◑ 20:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- I think there are probably attestations for this. What's the policy on website names? —Globins (talk) 03:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- WT:BRAND and Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion/Brand names, I think. — SGconlaw (talk) 03:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- WT:CFI - maybe section for brand names or names of specific entities? Anyhow, website names can be included as e.g. Wikipedia, YouTube (the proper noun), hence there's no proper reason for deletion. If there are any doubts about attestation, it would be a matter for WT:RFVE. -91.6.202.91 03:48, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep but RfV as a brand. DCDuring (talk) 13:51, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep and RFV per DCD. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 22:11, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- WT:BRAND and Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion/Brand names, I think. — SGconlaw (talk) 03:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept, but sent to RfV. bd2412 T 18:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Moved from RfD. Must meet WT:BRAND. bd2412 T 18:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2018 (UTC)