Talk:Elx
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ruakh in topic Request for verification
Request for verification
[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
A symbol nobody uses for the exalux, a unit nobody uses. Equinox ◑ 16:51, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- This falls within the scope of the as-yet unresolved discussion at Wiktionary:Beer parlour#SI units and abbreviations. Cheers! bd2412 T 23:11, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- An exemption for this class of units is now under review at Wiktionary:Votes/2009-12/Proposed CFI exception for SI Units. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:08, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
RFV failed, entry deleted. —RuakhTALK 01:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)