Talk:AAA
"Ascended Awkwardly Association"
[edit]Removed - no other instances in Google, Ask, Live, Yahoo ! Suspiciously at end - out of alpabetic order ! --195.137.93.171 11:41, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Request for verification
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/Keep_tidy.svg/55px-Keep_tidy.svg.png)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-senses: (many) On July 30, 2005 many unvetted items from w:AAA were moved here: some proper nouns, some jargon, some dupes. Of proper nouns about 10 are for orgs that have WP articles; some might get articles; some had articles deleted, some are debatable. I've rfved the ones that seem the worst. I have the feeling that the WP dab group is likely to do a better job with proper nouns than us. We might do better with the jargon. Under our current interpretation of the lemming rule the terms would all be included I think. DCDuring TALK 15:33, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- RFV failed, all tagged senses removed. —RuakhTALK 03:34, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/Keep_tidy.svg/55px-Keep_tidy.svg.png)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-senses:
- assign alternate are
- Alaska
- I couldn't find much for Alaska, but "assign alternate area" seems to be a military acronym. Most of what I found were mentions, but I did put two cites on the citations page. Kiwima (talk) 20:04, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- I have failed Alaska. With two cites, I am giving Assign Alternate Area some more time. Kiwima (talk) 21:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
RFV-failed. Kiwima (talk) 21:07, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/Keep_tidy.svg/55px-Keep_tidy.svg.png)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense: Initialism of Action Awareness Alert. --Vealhurl (talk) 00:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Virtually nothing to be found outside of abbreviation lists, but I did spot this document about nuclear plant safety [1]: "A computerized system is used (Action/Awareness/Alert) to communicate data or requests between the procurement group, the procurement engineer and the corporate level." So apparently it's three things (action, awareness, alert — like lights, camera, action), not a single noun phrase ("an action awareness alert"). Equinox ◑ 23:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- " Along with the quote I put on the citations page, that gives us two. Kiwima (talk) 00:31, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 21:07, 15 January 2020 (UTC)