Draft:Semiotics

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Early Greek alphabet is painted on the body of an Attic black-figure cup at the National Archaeological Museum of Athens. Credit: Marsyas.

Semiotics is the study of signs and symbols and their use or interpretation. It is a part of the Social Sciences.

"Semiotics is subdivided into three areas: semantics, pragmatics, and syntactics."[1]

These in turn are

  • the relation between signs and the things to which they refer; their denotata, or meaning, Semantics,
  • relations among signs in formal structures, Syntactics, and
  • relation between signs and the effects they have on the people who use them, Pragmatics.

Things

[edit | edit source]

"The new country Iceland needed an organisation and people decided to found here a parliament, a whole-country-thing (= Alþingi) after the example of their Norse forefathers and kin. The parliament Alþingi was founded in 930 on the plains of Þingvellir which had newly come into possession of the state, where in the summer time, when the parliament meetings were to take place for 2 weeks in June each, was a lot of water and fodder for horses and which were easily to reach from all parts of the country."[2]

In terms of meaning and generalness: 'being' > 'body' > 'something' or 'thing' > 'entity'.[3]

Def.

1.a: "a separate and distinct individual quality, fact, idea, or [usually] entity",
1.b: "the concrete entity as distinguished from its appearances",
1.c: "a spatial entity", or
1.d: "an inanimate object distinguished from a living being"

is called a thing.[4]

Relationships

[edit | edit source]

"[T]he relationship between outer-space geography and geographic position (astrogeography), and the evolution of current and future military space strategy"[5] has been identified and evaluated.[5]

Def. the "links between the x-values and y-values of ordered pairs of numbers especially coordinates"[6] is called a relationship.

Definitions

[edit | edit source]

“[D]efinitions are always of symbols, for only symbols have meanings for definitions to explain.”[7] A term can be one or more of a set of symbols such as words, phrases, letter designations, or any already used symbol or new symbol.

“[T]he symbol being defined is called the definiendum, and the symbol or set of symbols used to explain the meaning of the definiendum is called the definiens.”[7] “The definiens is not the meaning of the definiendum, but another symbol or group of symbols which, according to the definition, has the same meaning as the definiendum.”[7]

Theory of semiotics

[edit | edit source]

Def. "a general philosophical theory of signs and symbols that deals [especially] with their functions in both artificially constructed and natural languages and comprises syntactics, semantics, and pragmatics" is called semiotics (or semiotic).[4]

Def. the "study of signs and symbols, especially as means of language or communication"[8] is called semiotics.

Semiotics, also called semiotic studies or (in the Ferdinand de Saussure, Saussurean tradition) semiology, is the study of signs and sign processes (semiosis), indication, designation, likeness, analogy, metaphor, symbolism, signification, and communication. Semiotics is closely related to the field of linguistics, which, for its part, studies the structure and meaning of language more specifically.

"The semiotic ladder consists of the following steps: physical world, empirics, syntactics, semantics, pragmatics and social world."[9]

Signs

[edit | edit source]

Def.

1.a: a "gesture by which a thought is expressed"
b: "one of a set of gestures used to represent language"
2: "a mark having a conventional meaning and used in place of words or to represent a complex notion"

is called a sign.[4]

In semiotics, sign is something that can be interpreted as having a meaning, which is something other than itself, and which is therefore able to communicate information to the one interpreting or decoding the sign. Signs can work through any of the senses, visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory or taste, and their meaning can be intentional such as a word uttered with a specific meaning, or unintentional such as a symptom being a sign of a particular medical condition.

A letter is a grapheme in an alphabetic system of writing, such as the Greek alphabet and its descendants. Letters compose phonemes and each phoneme represents a phone (sound) in the spoken form of the language.

A character (from the Greek χαρακτήρ "engraved or stamped mark" on coins or seals, "branding mark, symbol"[10]) may refer to any sign or symbol.

A grapheme is the smallest semantically distinguishing unit in a written language, analogous to the phonemes of spoken languages. A grapheme may or may not carry meaning by itself, and may or may not correspond to a single phoneme. Graphemes include alphabetic letters, typographic ligatures, Chinese characters, numerical digits, punctuation marks, and other individual symbols of any of the world's writing systems.

Symbol

[edit | edit source]
A red octagon symbolizes "stop" even without the word. Credit: MagicImage.

Def.

1: "something that stands for or suggests something else by reason of relationship, association, convention, or accidental resemblance"
2: "an arbitrary or conventional sign used in writing or printing relating to a particular field to represent operations, quantities, elements, relations, or qualities"
3: "an act, sound, or object having cultural significance and the capacity to excite or objectify a response"

is called a symbol.[4]

A symbol is something that represents an idea, a process, or a physical entity. The purpose of a symbol is to communicate meaning. For example, a red octagon may be a symbol for "STOP". On a map, a picture of a tent might represent a campsite. Numerals are symbols for numbers. Personal names are symbols representing individuals. A red rose symbolizes love and compassion.

Interpretations

[edit | edit source]

Allegorical interpretation is an approach that assumes a text is not literal.

Language interpretation is the facilitation of dialogue between parties using different languages.

Draft:Semantics is the "assignment of meanings to symbols.

Philosophical interpretation is the assignment of meanings to various concepts, symbols, or objects under consideration.

Aesthetic interpretation is an explanation of the meaning of some work of art.

In Draft:logic, interpretation is "an assignment of meaning to the symbols of a formal language.

Hermeneutics is the study of interpretation theory.

Exegesis is a critical explanation or interpretation of a text.

Def. the effect of a sign on someone who reads or comprehends it is called an interpretant.

Semiology

[edit | edit source]

Although semiotics and semiology are probably always considered as exact synonyms, for the purpose of discussion, let the following definition be so:

Def. the study of signs and sign processes (semiosis), indication, designation, likeness, analogy, metaphor, symbolism, signification, and communication is called semiology.

At the outset, the simplest difference between semiotics and semiology is the origin of each word. Semiotics comes from the Greek semeiotikos. Semiology is a combined form of the Greek semion and the Latin logy.

Classifications

[edit | edit source]

Signs or sign systems are classified in relation to the way they are transmitted (see modality). This process of carrying meaning depends on the use of codes that may be the individual sounds or letters that humans use to form words, the body movements they make to show attitude or emotion, or even something as general as the clothes they wear.

Semiosis

[edit | edit source]

Semiosis is any form of activity, conduct, or process that involves signs, including the production of meaning. Briefly – semiosis is sign process. The term describes a process that interprets signs as referring to their objects, as described in the theory of sign relations, or semiotics. Semiosis is in reciprocal determinism triadic and per social cycle theory cyclic. Other theories of sign processes are sometimes carried out under the heading of semiology.

Social semiotics

[edit | edit source]

"Logonomic rules rest on a set of classifications of people, topics and circumstances which are the result of contestation over long periods, but which ultimately derive from the ruling ideas of the dominant group."[11]

Hypotheses

[edit | edit source]
  1. Semiotics may study the sign and symbol dominant group and its use or interpretation.

See also

[edit | edit source]

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. Charles Suhor (1984). "Towards a Semiotics‐based Curriculum". Journal of Curriculum Studies 16 (3): 247-57. doi:10.1080/0022027840160304. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0022027840160304. Retrieved 2012-04-20. 
  2. Reykholt (16 October 2015). Þingvellir/History. San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/%C3%9Eingvellir/History. Retrieved 6 April 2019. 
  3. Peter Mark Roget (1969). Lester V. Berrey and Gorton Carruth. ed. Roget's International Thesaurus, third edition. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company. pp. 1258. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Philip B. Gove, ed (1963). Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary. Springfield, Massachusetts: G. & C. Merriam Company. pp. 1221. https://books.google.com/books?id=JtN_tgEACAAJ. Retrieved 2011-08-26. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Everett C. Dolman (2002). Astropolitik: Classical Geopolitics in the Space Age. London: Frank Cass Publishers. pp. 208. ISBN 0-7146-5200-8. http://books.google.com/books?id=2lJejzEygDQC&pg=PP3&hl=en. Retrieved 2011-12-12. 
  6. Fletcherjp (17 February 2018). relationship. San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/relationship. Retrieved 2 October 2018. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Irving M. Copi (1955). Introduction to Logic. New York: The MacMillan Company. pp. 472. 
  8. SemperBlotto (2 August 2005). semiotics. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/semiotics. Retrieved 2011-11-03. 
  9. Göran Goldkuhl and Pär J. Ågerfalk (2002). Kecheng Liu. ed. Actability: A Way to Understand Information Systems Pragmatics, In: Coordination and Communication using Signs Studies in Organisational Semiotics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0803-8_4. ISBN 978-0-7923-7509-8. http://www.springerlink.com/index/QX17165382256652.pdf. Retrieved 2012-04-20. 
  10. χαρακτήρ, Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, on Perseus
  11. Robert Ian Vere Hodge and Gunther R. Kress (1988). Social semiotics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. pp. 285. ISBN 0-8014-9515-6. http://books.google.com/books?id=wk427pgr8xAC&printsec=frontcover&hl=en#v=onepage&f=false. Retrieved 2012-02-02. 

Further reading

[edit | edit source]
[edit | edit source]