Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 19

July 19

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 19, 2024.

"Fax (hair)" and "Fax (head hair)"

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 27#"Fax (hair)" and "Fax (head hair)"

Mario Circuit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 21:03, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Circuit → Mario Kart (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned in the target. Mia Mahey (talk) 21:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as track from game. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 03:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The reason it was reverted into a redirect is because it was completely unsourced. It should only return to being an article if reliable sources relating to it show that it is noteworthy enough to include on Wikipedia. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 11:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Revert to an article without prejudice to AfD per WP:BLAR. Thryduulf (talk) 12:58, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or restore article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It should be trivially easy to find a source supporting inclusion in the target article. BD2412 T 03:08, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bolsover (borough)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 8#Bolsover (borough)

Guillermo Vilas: Settling the Score

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 27#Guillermo Vilas: Settling the Score

Bigflo & Oli: Hip Hop Frenzy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 12:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bigflo & Oli: Hip Hop Frenzy → Lists of Netflix original films (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not sure what to do about this one. The subject exists (per third party searches) and is linked at List of Netflix original films (2020) in the list of film released that year. But ... the fact that this title is a redirect and not an article seems to validate WP:REDYES deletion. In addition, the article for the group mentioned in the title of his redirect, Bigflo & Oli, seems to make no mention or reference of the subject of this redirect anywhere in that article. Steel1943 (talk) 21:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Jay 💬 17:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Running with Sherman (film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 12:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Running with Sherman (film) → Lists of Netflix original films (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Yet another story which Netflix bought the rights in 2019 to create a film, but nothing came out of it since. The base title Running with Sherman is a redirect that targets Christopher McDougall#Works (after I retargeted it last month), the article about the author of the "Running with Sherman" story, but that article contains no information about a film adaptation of the "Running with Sherman" story. Steel1943 (talk) 21:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Jay 💬 17:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lady Business (film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Business (film) → Lists of Netflix original films (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Seems this was a story which Netflix bought the rights in 2019 with the intent to make a film, but it does not seem as though the film ever went into production. Also, it seems the film was to star Brie Larson; online searches for the "Lady Business" turn up nothing at the present time 5 years later ... well, while also distinguishing that the "Lady Business" film is a subject separate from Unicorn Store. Steel1943 (talk) 20:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. If anyone else thinks this feels familiar, you're probably (like me) thinking of Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 11#Lady Business, which turns out to be unrelated, although if this is to become an article the parenthetical will not be needed. Thryduulf (talk) 11:02, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Jay 💬 17:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

VSTA

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Jay 💬 17:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

VSTA → Visual Studio Tools for Applications (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I have just created VSTA (disambiguation), and while I would grant that the current redirect target is the most popular target directly using this acronym, I lean towards thinking that there is no primary target, and the disambiguation should be moved over the redirect. BD2412 T 19:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

AlphaDeltaNationalFraternity

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 - created when fixing an unambiguous error. Thryduulf (talk) 11:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AlphaDeltaNationalFraternity → Alpha Delta (national) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Words run together unlikely mistype. Naraht (talk) 19:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No substantial history; appears to have been created by error, since the author moved the page to a correct title. I see no other source formatting this without spaces. Too new to have been old camelcase links. Delete Ca ^{talk to me!} 02:39, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Return to the Palace

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect converted to an article. Probably safe to close this early, given the circumstance. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 22:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Return to the Palace → List of programs broadcast by Seoul Broadcasting System (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at the target page. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 18:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i just want to redirect it for a while.., but anyway the page was created. Aidillia^(talk) 22:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

PKMN R

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PKMN R → Pokémon Red, Blue, and Yellow (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

what about pokémon ruby? cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 16:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as vague. First thing that comes to mind is actually Team Rocket. GSearch also have Team Rocket as one of the top image hits. --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Lenticel. Vague indeed. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cianwood Island

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 27#Cianwood Island

Cianwood City (Cianwood Island)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 27#Cianwood City (Cianwood Island)

PKMN SS

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 15:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PKMN SS → Pokémon HeartGold and SoulSilver (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

has it been agreed that sword and shield will always be abbreviated as "swsh", or could this be dabified? cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 14:51, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. For some reason, this abbreviation makes me think of the ship in Red, Blue, and Yellow (probably because of the use of "SS"). Probably best to just delete this thing. Steel1943 (talk) 15:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I first thought it referred to the ship in Pikmin. Ca ^{talk to me!} 02:37, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per both above. Misleading and unhelpful. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vague --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

HeartSilver and GoldSoul

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 06:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HeartSilver and GoldSoul → Pokémon HeartGold and SoulSilver (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

that's actually pretty funny and almost a plausible mistake, but they're not even consistently named. one is mind thing/metal and the other is metal/mind thing. more than anything, i vote to delete this as aesthetically painful cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 14:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Plausible mix-up; readers may not realize that one is mind thing/metal and the other is metal/mind thing. The adjectives (as a non-pokemon fan) seem arbitrary to me, and I can see myselft making this mistake. Ca ^{talk to me!} 02:36, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Ca. Thryduulf (talk) 11:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it's fine. Deleting it would acting as if we don't know what the user is searching for when they say "HeartSilver and GoldSoul", when it's clear what article they're looking for. The colours and names don't mean anything anyway - I've played one of these two games and I have absolutely no recollection if it was HeartGold or SoulSilver or HeartSilver or SoulGold or GoldSilver or HeartSoul or whatever combination of arbitrary words GameFreak chose to get people buying multiple copies of the same game that year BugGhost 🦗👻 17:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

generally, if you don't know which one you played, that means it was heartgold cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 10:53, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pokémon DuskGold and DawnSilver

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 28#Pokémon DuskGold and DawnSilver

Galar

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 18:18, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Galar → Pokémon Sword and Shield#Setting (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

there's apparently at 2 more things with this name, but i'm mostly concerned about fjalar and galar, the smartness juice guys from norse mythology. is this worth a dab or hatnote, or is this specific galar a primary as h*ck topic? cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 14:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create disambiguation page there are several Galars that are pretty notable subjects (The main location of a high selling videogame, a figure in Norse mythology, a town in Spain, a village in Wales, and apparently a redirect at Bahnar language) All of these are pretty important subjects, and I can't see which one would be the primary topic. I feel a DAB page would very much be helpful here given the number of things that have the name Galar. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 18:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dabify due to multiple potential targets --Lenticel ^(talk) 12:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate Per others, no obvious primary topic. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate: Seems like the best option. C F A 💬 18:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely. Not even Pokemon references are consistently for just "Galar", rather there's many to "Galar Region". --Joy (talk) 11:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

200 (song)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 28#200 (song)

M-Block

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

M-Block → MissingNo. (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

'm (or 'm block) is a glitch pokémon that shares missingno's "sprite", index number, and some functions, but is otherwise a different glitch. it's not mentioned in the article aside from an offhanded mention in the translation for source 1 cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 17:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. AFAIK we don't discuss the 'M glitch in any other capacity, the most common method of finding MissingNo will also turn up 'M, and it doesn't just copy SOME functions, but PRACTICALLY ALL functions. For our intents and purposes, 'M and MissingNo. are the same thing and should be treated accordingly by redirects. Leave further details to Glitch City Labs and Bulbapedia. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 23:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

for pedantries that would border on fancruft if there weren't actually a couple of sources behind them...

missingno (the form everyone recognizes, that is) can be obtained via the old man and mew glitches and the time capsule exploit with certain names, special stats, and gen 2 pokémon respectively, adds 128 items to the item in the 6rd slot of the player's bag, and corrupts hall of fame data

'm (specifically 00, as fe and ff are just hybrids) can only be obtained via the old man glitch and shares missingno's sprite, item cloning, and hall of fame corruption as a result of sharing its index number, but has (slightly) different data, such as moves and cries, can evolve into clefairy or kangaskhan, and lets you catch phantom ditto. according to some old stuff i found, it can also apparently spontaneously turn into a rhydon if you have another 'm in your party

from a quick-ish look, those two sources mention 'm and its differences compared to missingno in some level of detail, an archive of the latter currently being source 9 in missingno's article, so if a mention could be added or discussed, i wouldn't be opposed to it cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 14:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Lunamann.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on adding a mention at the target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:42, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i was going to suggest it in the talk page right after this closed, guess i'll have to wait another week cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 11:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you have to wait for this to be closed to make a talk page suggestion? I assume you are now good with this closing as Keep? Jay 💬 12:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

seems like a good time to do it. just wouldn't want a pesky rfd process risking a sudden finding of another unrelated "m block" cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 19:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pokémon incident

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 12#Pokémon incident

Biographies of living persons

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:55, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies of living persons → Biography (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This should be a CNR to WP:BLP. All of the 304 links to this redirect are in reference to the Wikipedia policy, rather than the Biography article. It seems unlikely that anyone searching for this would be looking for the encyclopedic article, especially considering the term is never mentioned. It was retarted to Biography from a CNR in 2009. C F A 💬 18:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I suppose this could also be retargeted to an encyclopedia article about Wikipedia, like Wikipedia#Policies_and_content, Vandalism on Wikipedia, or List of Wikipedia controversies (Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident), though a project redirect would make the most sense in my eyes. C F A 💬 18:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget (or add encyclopaedic content) This is a very high profile policy that does get referenced frequently off-site so I'm surprised we don't have some encyclopaedic content about it that could host a hatnote to the policy, although finding sources will be tricky due to the large number of Wikipedia mirrors and many other sites that have policies/guidelines with the same title. If we don't have encyclopaedic content then a cross-namespace redirect is the way to go - this is something that needs to be very easy to find, particularly by prospective editors and article subjects who shouldn't have to learn about namespaces first. Thryduulf (talk) 20:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering if there would be enough coverage to write a separate article on the policy. I found it surprising that even the Policies and content section in the main Wikipedia article only briefly mentioned the policy (in reference to the Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident). If someone is willing to do that and they can find enough coverage, then that (with a hatnote) would be my preferred outcome over retargeting. C F A 💬 21:09, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Its not really a Wikipedia specific term but all Google results are for the policy. Maybe it should be kept as with a link on the DAB page to the BLP policy as well as the current MOS page. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I was considering doing before listing it here, but I decided against it. Do you really think anyone typing "Biographies of living persons" into the search bar is looking for Biography? It is obviously directly referencing the policy and the term isn't even mentioned in the article. C F A 💬 03:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotes incorrect linkage, and making a CNR would not be for readership content. -- 65.92.247.96 (talk) 03:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. There's no way BLP isn't notable and we should really have some encyclopedic content about it. Nickps (talk) 19:39, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless an alternative article space target is found. Biographies are about people, but not all biographies are about living people. (And, morbidly enough, all biographies in existence today will eventually all not be about living people...) Steel1943 (talk) 22:56, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I notified WT:WPWP of this discussion Nickps (talk) 22:42, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I searched around a bit, and I do not think there is enough in the way of external sources covering this to support an article. Perhaps an article could be written on Wikipedia policies and guidelines, with a section on BLP. BD2412 T 23:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's no justification for a WP:CNR: "most newly created cross-namespace redirects from the main (article) namespace to the Wikipedia (project) namespace should be deleted, ... very old ones might retain their value for extra-Wikipedia links" (not inter-Wikipedia links). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note the key word there is "most" not "all" - there are exceptions and this is one of them per my comments above. Thryduulf (talk) 11:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Skeltal

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 20:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Skeltal → Skeleton (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

that's the "doot" meme. doesn't seem like a plausible misspelling of "skeletal" otherwise, as e is just close enough to t where it'd be hard to forget to type one letter cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 18:09, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: per WP:CHEAP. C F A 💬 19:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Skeltal is a variant name of a popular internet meme [1]. Our article on skeleton lack information about this meme, neither do any other article. The intro of WP:REDIRECT, a guideline says Redirects are used to help people arrive more quickly at the page they want to read. A generic article about skeletons are not what readers would want to see when they are searching about a meme. Ca ^{talk to me!} 05:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems pretty obscure. I doubt there's enough coverage to write an article on it, but I suppose someone could try. I imagine most people searching "Skeltal" on Wikipedia are looking for "Skeletal," which is also a redirect to Skeleton. C F A 💬 15:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it's a phonetic mispelling of "skeletal" that's only one letter removed. No harm in keeping it. BugGhost 🦗👻 17:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

One PIece

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 12:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One PIece → One Piece (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

that's an uppercase i cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 17:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: per WP:CHEAP. C F A 💬 19:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Implausible misspelling. Our search function automatically handles different capitalizations. I tend to agree that effort of listing redirects with minor errors can be used elsewhere, but we might as well delete them as they are listed to reduce maintance work for useless redirects. Ca ^{talk to me!} 05:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WEak keep per sticky shift key typo error, a very plausible sort of error you see in online forums all the time. -- 65.92.247.96 (talk) 08:40, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Highly unlikely someone is going to capitalize the "i" in "Piece" but not the "n" in "One". In addition, this redirect should not be linked in articles. Also, if this redirect is deleted, trying to search "One PIece" in Wikipedia's search function will return One Piece. Deletion of this redirect seems to have more benefits than harm. Steel1943 (talk) 22:53, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Steel. This is not a redirect from a page move from a typo. We don't know what made Amidamaru89 create this redirect in 2007, but it had a good run for an year in 2002-23. Jay 💬 15:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Suiattle tribe

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suiattle tribe → Sauk-Suiattle (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete. No links to this redirect, and I can't see anything ever linking to this. Given that "Suiattle" has almost no literature (independent from the Sauk-Suiattle or Sauk themselves), and as far as I am aware, they weren't a tribe, but just a term that referred to people who would traditionally go to the Suiattle River during the summer gathering season in pre-colonial times, I can't forsee this ever being necessary as a redirect. PersusjCP (talk) 01:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The primary purpose of a redirect is not to catch links within wikipedia, but to assist users searching for the topic. The target article, in the lead, says that Sauk-Suiattle is a tribe, which makes it plausible enough that someone would search for either "Sauk tribe" or "Suiattle tribe" regardless of the technical accuracy of those search terms. A redirect is not an endorsement of fact or accuracy, just a search aid. Fieari (talk) 03:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That makes sense, thank you for explaining! PersusjCP (talk) 20:03, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW I would like to withdraw this as the nom (if possible) given the rationale but I don't know how to do that for a redirect. PersusjCP (talk) 20:25, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Fieari. Thryduulf (talk) 09:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: reasonable search term. No reason to delete. C F A 💬 14:56, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

July 19

"Fax (hair)" and "Fax (head hair)"

Mario Circuit

Bolsover (borough)

Guillermo Vilas: Settling the Score

Bigflo & Oli: Hip Hop Frenzy

Running with Sherman (film)

Lady Business (film)

VSTA

AlphaDeltaNationalFraternity

Return to the Palace

Pokemon generations 5

Misty Williams

Brock Harrison

PKMN R

Cianwood Island

Cianwood City (Cianwood Island)

PKMN SS

HeartSilver and GoldSoul

Pokémon DuskGold and DawnSilver

Galar

200 (song)

M-Block

Pokémon incident

Biographies of living persons

Skeltal

One PIece

Suiattle tribe