Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sifu-keith
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was : withdrawn.
Refer to WP:UP#NOT and WP:NOT. Wikipedia userpages are not places to ONE place information irrelavent to Wikipedia, TWO repositories for deleted articles, and THREE a Myspace or some other repository for nonsense. Also note that Userpages are not sandboxes (and one should also not use sandboxes as repositories for deleted articles). His userpage is a store for deleted articles, refer to his talk page and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sifu keith tv. -- -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: From WP:USERPAGE, a userpage is not a place for "A weblog recording your non-Wikipedia activities, Extensive discussion not related to Wikipedia, Excessive personal information unrelated to Wikipedia, Advertising or promotion of a business or organization unrelated to Wikipedia, Extensive self-promotional material that is unrelated to your activities as a Wikipedian, Other non-encyclopedic related material." From WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not the place for Original inventions, Self-promotion, File storage areas, and Wikipedia is not your web host. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 12:57, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- keep and warn although it looks like an article, it is very likely to be a light-hearted self commentary by the user. Down the bottom notice the note that says it is a joke. This is not a file storage use, or given the disclaimer, an advertisement. This user has been adding joke edits to Wikipedia, so they need to be clearly warned (not so far). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- comment from this user's talk page and contribs, he has made frequent disrputive edits, refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sifu keith tv, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dil (Surname), and other nonsense created to Osama Bin Laden and other articles. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 00:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- comment For your information the Osama Bin Laden page was not unnecessary and there were sources linking it, before you accuse, go check your sources User:Sifu-keith 00:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, and I don't think that signature is appropriate either. It does not meet Wikipedia guidelines, as it prevents easy identification or contact, as per WP:SIGNATURE. Sure, its tough, but policy is policy. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 01:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, well I don't agree, It doesn't exactly identify me now does it. Doesn't your username reveal your full name too, well i believe that identifies who you are too. So if I were you, I would check WP:SIGNATURE as well to read up about it. user:Sifu-keith 01:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- It must link to your page and talk page. That is policy. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 01:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- If you say so! Sifu Keith 01:29, 22 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sifu-keith (talk • contribs)
- It is best not for Benlisquare to complain about signatures, with one that does not identify him to non Chinese readers! Any way the signature is not the issue here. I have suggested that Sifu-keith improves his user page. If this happens we can close this discussion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- If you say so! Sifu Keith 01:29, 22 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sifu-keith (talk • contribs)
- It must link to your page and talk page. That is policy. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 01:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, well I don't agree, It doesn't exactly identify me now does it. Doesn't your username reveal your full name too, well i believe that identifies who you are too. So if I were you, I would check WP:SIGNATURE as well to read up about it. user:Sifu-keith 01:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, and I don't think that signature is appropriate either. It does not meet Wikipedia guidelines, as it prevents easy identification or contact, as per WP:SIGNATURE. Sure, its tough, but policy is policy. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 01:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- comment For your information the Osama Bin Laden page was not unnecessary and there were sources linking it, before you accuse, go check your sources User:Sifu-keith 00:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- comment from this user's talk page and contribs, he has made frequent disrputive edits, refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sifu keith tv, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dil (Surname), and other nonsense created to Osama Bin Laden and other articles. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 00:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Looks fine enough now. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 02:01, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Benlisquare, do you want to withdraw your nomination now that it has resulted in an improvement? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Sure. All looks satisfactory. Withdraw. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 09:37, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.