Help desk
< January 14	<< Dec \| January \| Feb >>	January 16 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

January 15

how to get novel purchased

I wants to buy a novel TELL YOUR DREAMS in India Where and how I can get it — Preceding unsigned comment added by NBSAJJA (talk • contribs) 04:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our over 6 million articles and thought we were affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is for asking questions related to using or contributing to Wikipedia itself. Thus, we have no special knowledge about the subject of your question. You can, however, search our vast catalogue of articles by typing a subject into the search field on the upper right side of your screen. If you cannot find what you are looking for, we have a reference desk, divided into various subject areas, where asking knowledge questions is welcome. Best of luck. RudolfRed (talk) 04:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Remember a Day Darryl Read pages

Dear Team/Editors There seems to be a problem regarding the Darryl Read page I created, this page has been established here for three years, and has been adjusted in firstly creating it to Wiki criteria. In the last week, we have been continually harassed by LondonClanger and an administrator called Michig , with pages we created (Crushed Butler, Tiger (the group), Darryl Read, Remember a Day which LondonClanger requested to be deleted as well as multiple adjustments over a years period to all pages mentioned. He has sought the help of Michig, to sanction a deletion, and Michig has then gone on to try to question the Darryl Read page already established with you for 3 years, and get us to supply - in my opinion unnecessary; further sources and citations. I cant help thinking that both LondonClanger & Michig are using intellectual sabotage methods for other reasons other than improving articles for Wikipedia. In this aspect, I should like to register a complaint, regarding both LondonClanger and Michig - for misuse of administrative powers here on Wikipedia. Please check their talks and edits - especially LondonClanger's over a considerable period of time on (Crushed Butler, Tiger (the group), Darryl Read, pages. I am trying to communicate and resolve everything with Michig currently, but felt it now necessary to get further help from you on all. I have been editing here since 2009, with no problems and work within Wikipedia's realm of construction of credible articles, and have been able previously (some years back) work respectfully with other administrative editors, and complied to their requests CatWizard777 (talk) 06:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CatWizard777 (talk • contribs) 06:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see from your other posts that you ,CatWizard777, are Darryl Read and his publicity rep, Clive Zone. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. As it says there, you are strongly discouraged from creating articles related to Darryl Read or from editing them directly. If you would like to make changes to these articles, you should propose the changes on article talk pages.

Please also read WP:NOSHARING. Wikipedia accounts may be used by only one person; shared accounts are not permitted. —teb728 t c 07:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no sharing here whatsoever or people working for Darryl Read's publicity. I used to be Mr Read's publicist 12 years ago, but am no longer. I made the page from knowledge I collected over the years of Mr Read's extensive career, and felt that I could archive some history into the Wiki encyclopedia. I do not work with Mr Read, and neither are we close friends, - the name catwizard777 is used in connection with the name of the page Darryl Read. CatWizard777 (talk) 10:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How do you account then for this post from your account, which says, "This is Darryl Read here, … Yours sincerely Darryl Read (catwizard777)"? —teb728 t c 20:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Appears a lot of mudslinging and vitriol is being thrown my way by CatWizard777. All these accusations are wholly unwarranted and inaccurate, and others border on being rather abusive. Thankfully, I have a thick skin and it’s all a water off a duck’s back to me (nothing better that mixing metaphors...). For the record I merely commented on WP:Articles for deletion/Remember a Day (2000 film) and my recommendation re: WP:Articles for deletion/The Orange Illusion was reviewed by other editors. I’ve not recommended any other deletions – Michig has commented on Darryl Read and this has zero to do with me. There are several issues with conflict of interest on articles edited by CatWizard777 and I’ve been attempting over time to rewrite/update/copyedit where possible with a neutral tone – clearly something that CatWizard’s PR team (as it appears a few people use this login) have taken umbrage with. I’ll continue to add constructive editorial updates to articles in an earnest attempt to improve them. All very much a storm in a teacup to me. Londonclanger (talk) 12:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your points have been taken a were over a year ago when you started to make adjustments to all of Darryl Read's connected pages, an example was to insistently change the name of Tiger (the group) to Tiger, or Tiger band. I featured the name Tiger (the group) - to differentiate it from other bands with similar names, or not confusing it with the animal. You have constantly tried to remover detail from the pages connected with Read, that have been three years in standing on Wikipedia. You seemingly have dabbled with all the Read's connected pages, and yes made some corrections, but mainly have tried to cut out detail of quality. I can only think that when and editor continually tries to cut out works, or make them appear trivial - that they have some sort of grudge. All this in your persistence has created waves, and got pages finally deleted. So, no mudslinging - just fact! I am now working in a friendly way with other editors here to rectify the whole situation, especially with Remember a Day and existing work of merit, back from the workspace, as well as other edits - now necessary on other of Read related pages. CatWizard777 (talk) 10:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May I suggest you review the policy on linking within articles - that may help clear up your misunderstanding re:Tiger and why I make the changes I do (perhaps another editor can also point out the methodology). I'll continue to edit any article where I see imrovements can be made - all are made with the best intentions for readers. I do not have any conflict of interest with the articles and I edit hundreds not just ones that mention Mr. Read. It's clear to me, and I'd say most editors, that your violations of the conflict of interest policy has potentially had a detrimental effect on articles and led to Michig posting the necessary warnings. Miching did this and not me (though I support his comments wholeheartedly). There is no conspiracy here. There is no "intellectual sabotage". It's just editors and interested parties doing what thousands of editors do on a daily basis - improve Wikipedia for everyone. I dare say you'd like to have a lenghty ongoing rapport about "your pages" but please remember you don't "own" them, they are in the public domain for anyone to improve. If you want to challenge an update, but all means do so, discussion and talk pages are there for that purpose. Collaboration and understanding are the way to go and I'm all for that - I suggest you join us on the ride. As for deletions, new articles that add little to Wikipedia are challeged and removed. If you locate better sources of notability then articles will get their place within Wikipedia. It's not rocket science... Londonclanger (talk) 17:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

French-German or German-French? Dutch-Belgian or Belgian-Dutch?

When there's a person who holds both French and German citizenship/nationality, do we refer to that person a French-German or German-French same goes for a person who holds Dutch and Belgian citizenship/nationality I know I already found it somewhere here in Wikipedia but I can't remember where. Please provide a link if necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sairyu (talk • contribs) 07:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would probably say "Franco-German", because "Franco-" is a very well established prefix (like "Anglo-" and "Sino-"), but I know of no rule either in Wikipedia or generally that forbids "German-French" (or indeed "French-German"). --ColinFine (talk) 19:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ko i zašto[...]

Ko i zašto je zabranio korisničkom imenu Tajib Omerdić, za igranje igre BELOT-Kratko obrazložeenje;U trećoj sam životnoj dobi stopostotni invalid vrlo ozbiljan i zabrinut oko sebe i ponekad smognem snage da zaigram belot,u toj igi nikakove kom

Ko i u ime koje presude mi je trajno zabranjeno igranje igre BELOT Ne prosim i ne molim!Sa aspekta prava i civilizacijske pristojnosti obrazlažem;U trećoj sam životnoj dobi stopostotni invalid i trenutke opuštanja i zaborava na bolest utješim na kartanju igre belot.Nit kome odgovaram ni prigovaram,a kamoli nedaj bože nekoga da vriđema jer me moje rane vrijeđaju.Evo u zanje vrijem pokušavam da igram kad tam"-ovom korisniku trajno zabranjeno igranje"je li ova Guatanama.Nit prosim nit molim cicilizacijski vratite mi pravi na igru Tajib Omerdič- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.176.204.14 (talk) 07:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pozdrav. Ova stranica je engleske verzije Wikipedije. Vrlo malo od nas govoriti hrvatski, a ja mogu dati vrlo malo od onoga što govore, čak i uz strojno prevođenje, (kao što sam se napisati ovu poruku natrag na vas). Jeste li sigurni da ste ovo postavljanje na mjesto i na publiku te bi trebao biti? Hrvatska Wikipedija se može pristupiti ovdje.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 07:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe hr:Suradnik:Tajib Omerdić will help. It seems that back in 2007 the OP's user page on the Croation Wikipedia was deleted and they were blocked for using it like a blog to publish some poetry. Obviously, better dealt with over there. Astronaut (talk) 09:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Flemish_people

How do I add names to a list on the above Category page? [1]. There are at least a dozen reknowned Flemish Authors, that have articles, two of them Noble Prize winners, that are not listed. How do I add them? Clicking "edit" does not access the alphabetical lists. TY. §:~)--Buster Seven Talk 07:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You add an article to it by adding [[Category:Flemish people]] to the foot of that article. -- Hoary (talk) 08:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Yes! TY! Buster Seven Talk 08:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see you added Category:Flemish people to some people who were already in Category:Flemish writers. We usually don't duplicate like that. See more at Wikipedia:Categorization of people. You can get from Category:Flemish people to Category:Flemish writers via Category:Flemish people by occupation. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for info...Buster Seven Talk 15:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand how it is ok

That you will put one company into the wiipedia directory but a company of the exact same genre gets deleted. if this is the case I want to know why. and you can guarantee if this is how you do business here I will not be donating nothing to your website or to your pockets. So I want to know why this is what happened. And no I did not do the article myself. Here is the page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Lincs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uprentiss (talk • contribs) 08:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We do not have articles about every single company in a branche/genre and that is not our goal. We have articles about companies that are considered to be notable; and they are considered notable because they have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. And we do not want your money. Have a nice day, Von Restorff (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we wouldn't mind getting your money but we have strict policies against advertising so you don't get extra rights by donating. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And please read WP:OTHERSTUFF. -- Obsidi♠n Soul 08:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are mistaking Wikipedia for a business. It isn't, it's an encyclopaedia, it doesn't accept advertising, and it doesn't "do business". --ColinFine (talk) 19:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no i am not mistaking nothing I am not a moron I know the difference but it was not an advertisement it was a wikipedia page for a company going to be about where it is based and etc the same type of article as other businesses in that area. yet yall pick and choose what can go in and i do not appreciate that. and what do you mean you dont want money when every time someone comes here there is a banner up at the top begging for donations. i am not asking for special prifiledges i am asking for the same rights that other people has which you are not giving my companies is established and have been so whats the differnce between the two? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uprentiss (talk • contribs) 22:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The deleted article read so much like an advertisement made by the company that it made me cringe. I find it hard to imagine anybody could write that stuff without having the goal of advertising the company. The article creation was the only edit by the author. I looked at some articles linked at Comparison of online dating websites. None of them resembled the deleted article the least bit. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such thing as a "Wikipedia directory"; in fact, we explicitly declare that "Wikipedia is not a directory service"! We try to have articles on the more notable members of a category; but on a planet of over seven billion people and rising, we can't cover them all. (And we're not "doing business" here; we're attempting to create a reference work about notable subjects. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moving images from Commons to en.Wikipedia

Some images were mistakenly uploaded to Commons and are now under threat of deletion due to there being no freedom of panorama. I would like to move them to Wikipedia so they can continue to be used in articles here under a claim of fair use (and with suitable rationales of course). How do I go about maintaining the original licensing of the original uploader who took the images? Astronaut (talk) 08:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the image was originally uploaded here, then contact the deleting admin, explain the issue and ask for undeletion. If there is no response, then list it at Wikipedia:Deletion review. After undeletion, ensure the image info has enough to keep it from being moved again. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 12:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, the image was not uploaded to en.Wikipedia first. It was uploaded straight to Commons. The uploader is not very active at all and, apart from a brief flurry of activity in November, has never returned. Can I simply upload it to en.Wikipedia as if it was my own, then change the name of the author to the original uploader, or is there a better way to do this. Astronaut (talk) 16:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suicide Article

I am a complete novice and don't know how to insert what I propose into this article. Please assist.

Suicidal people are highly likely to be viewers of this page.

Please insert a warning or helpful note/links regarding suicide prevention or mental health at the top of the article. Something bold and colorful that is easy to see like a big picture or button or other attention-getter. The idea being that rather than just inspiration or confirmation of a method to die, one may also see words of discouragement from suicide and some links to mental health info. "Hey click here to find someone to talk to about suicide" with the link being a suicide hotline etc. I don't know what would be appropriate considering the broad use of Wikipedia, but hopefully you get the idea. Thank you for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.14.8.178 (talk) 09:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Past versions of the article have had similar warnings or links, but they were removed after discussion. You are welcome to begin a new discussion at Talk:Suicide methods, but you should look through the (lengthy) archives first. -- John of Reading (talk) 12:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

does wikipedia have a policy against links to newsreels?

I linked to some newsreels in the US government's FedFlix database at archive.org but a user deleted them as peripherally-related.

For example, on the Shasta Dam page, I added a link to a newsreel which included the inauguration of the Shasta Dam

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shasta_Dam&action=historysubmit&diff=470999752&oldid=470957050

does wikipedia have a policy against links to newsreels?

Thanks

Crowish (talk) 11:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia guidelines on external links apply to all kinds of external links. If Binksternet (talk · contribs) is correct in saying that the film only covers the topic trivially, then the link does not belong as an external link. If the film has something useful to say about the dam, then you could perhaps include that in the article and cite the video as your source. You could begin a discussion by posting at Talk:Shasta Dam. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's the key point. Does the newsreel film say something useful about the dam or is it fluffy "news lite" material without lasting value? I removed the link because I determined it was the latter. If something can be saved from the newsreel I would be more than happy to see it cited as a source for a good fact. Binksternet (talk) 05:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BLACKOUT donation question

Hello, I have a question. I want to support in the blackout of Wikipedia to protest against the SOPA Bill but I have to ask about the donation. Are you using Paypal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.8.230.180 (talk) 11:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Donationpage. Thank you, Von Restorff (talk) 12:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle

Normally, while nominating a page for deletion, I use twinkle to do the needful. But I have noticed that in certain non-protected pages, the option does not appear next to "Add to your watchlist" and "move page". I am using the vector skin right now. Does anyone have any idea of what's going on? X.One ^SOS 12:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, twinkle is not at all working for me. Has the software been put on a hold or something? X.One ^SOS 13:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried purging your cache?--Hallows AG 14:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, it's fine now. Just a minor problem, I guess. X.One ^SOS 18:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a while..

Just come back, having a look around and I noticed a new user right under my preferences.. What on earth is the "reviewer" right and why do I have it? o.O Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 15:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:User access levels#Reviewer. – ukexpat (talk) 16:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As to why you have the right, the log says you given it as a "long term user". -- John of Reading (talk) 17:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh right. Ta. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 19:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

important

How can u have my own profile and howe much.to maintain it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.85.215 (talk) 15:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone can create a user profile for free. If you're talking about having an actual Wikipedia article, they're created by volunteers on specific people, places and subjects based on notability, not for monetary favours. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 15:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But see WP:USER for what is and is not appropriate for a user page. – ukexpat (talk) 16:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

location of ram mandir, Peterborough

Hello.

I visited the list of Hindu Temples in England & found the Ram Mandir Peterborough is in South West region. It should actually be in East Midlands according to the regions specified in the list. I will appreciate if the error is amended.

Many thanks

Jayshree Mehta President Bharat Hibdu Samaj Peterborough — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.0.132.58 (talk) 15:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - I also moved some others into the correct region as well. Editing list of Hindu temples in England is something you could have done yourself. Astronaut (talk) 16:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

People not highlighted to link with Wiki.

The article about Zell Miller, former US Senator from Georgia has a reference to Herman Cain. Cain is not printed in blue so as to click a direct link to Cain's wiki.Recovdem (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

The mention of Herman Cain has been removed as unsourced.[2] See Help:Link#Wikilinks for how to make links. I see your account is from 2006 and this post is your first edit. Welcome! PrimeHunter (talk) 17:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Audio files autoplay

Is it/will it be possible to embed an audio file in a page that 'autoplays' when the page is opened in a browser window ? (HTML 5 <audio>tag with autoplay attribute). — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnittMD (talk • contribs) 17:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

: This page is for questions about using Wikipedia. Please consider asking this question at the Computing reference desk. They specialize in answering computer questions and will try to answer any question in the universe (except how to use Wikipedia, since that is what this Help Desk is for). Just follow the link and ask away. You could always try searching Wikipedia for an article related to the topic you want to know more about. I hope this helps. Singularity42 (talk) 17:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The question could easily be about Wikipedia pages. This is not possible and I suspect a suggestion about it would meet strong opposition. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's fairly obvious that UnittMD is asking how to accomplish an editing related task (or indeed if it is even possible) on Wikipedia. That is exactly what this page is for. My answer is just a guess, but I think it would be unlikely for audio files being auto played in articles to be considered acceptable. fredgandt 17:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To my surprise, I did not find a discussion of this issue. I may not have searched thoroughly. I would expect this to be discouraged, under WP:ASTONISH.

If it hasn't been discussed, it may be because the preferred way to include an audio file is with {{Listen}}, which doesn't seem to have an autoplay option.

Thanks for the support guys. I wasn't aware of Listen, which comes close to offering a solution, but currently lacks autoplay. It is UK law, Disability and Descrimination Act (DDA)*, that web sites are required to be ‘accessible’ to the visually impaired (amongst others) . I think Wikipedia should encourage compliance by ensuring an <audio> feature is made available on each and every page that is created. The HTML5 <audio>autoplay feature would seem a very simple route to compliance.

Part III of the DDA refers to the provision of goods, facilities and services. The Code of Practice which specifically mentions websites, can be downloaded in its entirety from the Equality and Human Rights Commission website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnittMD (talk • contribs) 19:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhere in amongst the many Wikipedia guidelines and policies I read about site accessibility re concerns of "taking control of the reader's browser" and how it was not the correct thing to do. Perhaps someone who knows the backwaters better than I may be able to point to the right page for this info. fredgandt 21:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hope not. While disability provision is a good thing, having the page autoplay any audio file that happens to be linked on the page is a bad idea. Luckily, the practice seems to be restricted to adverts, but I really find a web-page that plays some background music very quickly becomes obtrusive and very annoying, to the extent that I prefer not to visit again. Astronaut (talk) 13:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from which, the servers are based in California, USA, and therefore do not have to follow UK law. Mjroots (talk) 19:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some articles have an audio version. People who need audio, generally have access to screen reader software. Auto-play would be a vandalistic nightmare. Rich Farmbrough, 05:48, 19 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Expansion needed tag

I need a tag to put in the header of a page to state that the article needs more expansion. The article isn't "missing" info, it just needs additional writing (for example if the article is about a certain drug and there's an overview of it, we need to add adverse effects, side effects... etc)

So the tag {{missing information}} isn't exactly what I'm looking for --Abderrahman (talk) 18:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How about {{incomplete}} or {{expand section}}? I found a list at WP:TC, so you can look there too and see if something else would be better. RudolfRed (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

or look here Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types#Health. Nasnema Chat 19:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all =) that was helpful --Abderrahman (talk) 21:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citations In Leads

Why are the citation requirements less strict in leads? --81.100.44.233 (talk) 19:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section#Citations - the lead usually is a summary of cited text that comes after. Nasnema Chat 19:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading a new version of an image

Say I've found an image already on Wikimedia and I want to upload an edited version of it under the same filename - as has been done three times in today's featured image, for example. How is this done? I definitely knew before but it's slipped my mind. Trying to upload the edit with the same filename doesn't work as I just get a message saying "a file already exists with this name". Thanks. Cladach // m'obair? 19:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On the image information page click on the "Upload a new version of this file" link. – ukexpat (talk) 20:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) Cladach // m'obair? 20:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

searching for music keys in English--

I need to know what the spanish music key SI" is in English--and your encyclopedia doea not understand what I'm looking for--it keeps bringing up cities-and other subjects--can you help me?? thank you Linda — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.79.73.230 (talk) 21:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You could try asking at Wikipedia:Reference desk/humanities, Wikipedia:Reference desk/language, or Wikipedia:Reference desk/miscellaneous. fredgandt 21:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to be the key "B" according to this. fredgandt 21:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct. Wikipedia has an article on everything: Key signature names and translations. Dbfirs 21:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another option that I often use is to visit the non-English Wikipedia (es.wikipedia.org in this case), find the article there, then see if there's a transwiki link in the bottom of the toolbar to the left of the screen. These link to the corresponding article in other language versions of Wikipedia, so if there's an English article on the same thing (but with an English name) it would quite possibly be linked. Brammers (talk/c) 08:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Global Usage

Is there a way to determine the number of results that "Global Usage" returns, rather than the actual list of files? Useddenim (talk) 21:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Try Wikipedia:Village pump (technical).Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:37, 19 January 2012 (UTC)‎[reply]

It was answered at Commons:Help desk#Global Usage by Rillke. Useddenim (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

can't find submission

I cannot find any where the article which I submitted on Jan 14 2012 --> Lincoln University School of Law. I know, at a minimum, that the references need to be inlined. I now realize that I should have put it on my watchlist.

Secondly, how can I find that page which contains several lists of article types: those rcently accepted, those recently rejected, those that need additional work, those that were miscategorized?

Slidhome (talk) 22:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article is at User:Slidhome/H.T. Lockard‎. Besides a watchlist, you also have a tab at the top of the page labeled "my contributions" which would allow you to find this easily. There are no rejected and accepted articles exactly. There are articles which are brand new which have been submitted in the main article namespace; there are articles from that list that have not yet been patrolled; there are articles which have been looked at and left unmarked; others that have been marked for deletion under differing process (speedy deletion, proposed deletion or taken to articles for deletion); there are articles that have been tagged for maintenance in various ways (including as uncategorized [I don't think there's a category for miscategorized]): and there are articles like the one you created which have been drafted a subpage and await review before being moved to the mainspace.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Tangentially related) See also Lincoln University of Missouri (the article and the University's website do not cover their law school, which may have been discontinued after Brown v. Board of Education no longer segregated other law institutions). Dru of Id (talk) 22:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Were you looking for this page, containing pending, declined, accepted, and other groupings?--SPhilbrick (Talk) 23:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The OP did mention Lincoln University School of Law in an earlier post here in the Help Desk at #Experienced Article Writer Needed, but there doesn't seem to have been an article submission. - David Biddulph (talk) 02:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]