Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 December 30

< December 29	December 31 >

December 30

File:Triangle-red.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not used, OR by File:Triangle-red.svg Admrboltz (talk) 00:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:European and EU location legend.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, redundant to File:European location legend en.png Kelly ^hi! 04:21, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EU location legend en.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, redundant to File:European location legend en.png Kelly ^hi! 04:26, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bayas89mABAGLomaPrietaScaled.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that image is PD solely because creator receives federal funding. Kelly ^hi! 04:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As with another related image file, I am seeking clarification from the source. Info will probably not be available until after the holidays. Leonard G. (talk) 21:43, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:West Friesland (historical region).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. All concerns seem to have been rectified. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:46, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, can't find original source. Kelly ^hi! 04:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The original source is a since-deleted image from Dutch Wikipedia, File:WF historische regio.png, created by User:Ed Stevenhagen. The log is here. The image was formerly used in the West Friesland (historical region) article. Despite its low quality, it still could be useful since, in my opinion, the image now used isn't much better and less clearly delineates the area in question. I'll add it back to that article now for comparative purposes. — AjaxSmack 21:41, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SV age 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 06:21, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SV-ice-cream2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 06:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Boise State Micron Business Building.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Based on the usage, this image clearly fails WP:NFCC#8, as its main purpose is decorative rather than being the subject of commentary within the article. While there may currently actually be no free equivalent (WP:NFCC#1), it's a moot point considering its failure of #8. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:28, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of a building at Boise State University, used for decoration in the Boise State University article—this building is not otherwise mentioned in that article, and its apparent purpose is to provide a pretty picture of a building on campus. For that purpose, any nice photograph of a building on campus would work; this use fails WP:NFCC#1. Additionally, the use of this photograph does not "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic," and its omission would not be "detrimental to that understanding," so this use fails WP:NFCC#8. —Bkell (talk) 07:07, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The uploader, Burnanator, has replied with a {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}} tag on the file description page, saying, "This building is not yet constructed, so no image can be obtained. These images were also freely released the media by the university, so they may not even be protected." I do understand that this building has not yet been constructed, so I did not claim that it would be possible to take a photograph of this particular building—what I am saying is that there doesn't seem to be any pressing need to show this particular building in the article. As for the second point, we must assume that all creative works are copyrighted until proven otherwise—that's the way copyright law works, unfortunately. —Bkell (talk) 07:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This building is not yet constructed, so no image can be obtained. Further, the image directly relates to the article's discussion of Boise State University's infrastructure "Master Plan," and is specifically referenced in the text. This building is one of the hallmarks of the university Master Plan and illustrates concepts discussed in detail in the article.Burnanator (talk) 07:35, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gordsinclair.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, can't verify source. Kelly ^hi! 07:59, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Johnnyfay.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, original source deleted as non-free. Kelly ^hi! 08:01, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paullanglois.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, original source deleted as non-free. Kelly ^hi! 08:01, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brett43.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 08:15, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arth Manthan Front.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic, sourced to random website, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ethnic Persians Map.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no source for base map, coloration has unclear meaning, this map is currently used in the article Persian people instead Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:34, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, the Map needs to be removed, since i have later on created a Much better version, with proper recommendations... thank you Arab League User (talk) 07:29, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wien u-bahn line 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not particularly good-quality and not very encyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:35, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adam and Phil Breakfast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned self-photo Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:36, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Turcao.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free photograph of a living person (Antonio Petrus Kalil) taken from a news agency. Likely violates WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#2. See the first and seventh examples of unacceptable use of non-free images. —Bkell (talk) 14:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This image fits on the subst:rfu category and thus should be candidate for speedy deletion. Also important to notice, that the user who posted this picture DonCalo, has ignored the warnings of NFCC three times on this image alone and also on several other images of his entry, disrupting the wiki environment. 189.25.64.39 (talk) 13:54, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VaasaTritonia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

not totally clear if uploader is the photographer. looks like an easy place to get a repeat photo, so i think this one should be deleted. it's an orphan currently, btw. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WLASticker.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stolenheartcabaret.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, target article Stolen Heart Cabaret deleted Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DramAward.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TAE tractor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, confusing source (is this self-taken?), conflicting licensing (copyright and public domain) Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Grayprom.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Deet.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Version #1, which had fuzzy licensing here, is already on Commons as File:DEET.svg. As far as version 2 is concerned, the file is not being used anywhere, and the article DEET does not indicate where it might be used, and so I don't see the educational value in keeping that image around on Commons. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no description. Kelly ^hi! 17:39, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
move both versions to commons as say File:Deet1.png and File:Deet2.png ([1] and [2] ) The current version, uploaded by IMeowbot (talk · contribs) is a fully hydrogen-labelled version of File:DEET.svg, which may be useful in illustrating the dropping of hydrogen in diagrams. The first version, uploaded by Maximus Rex has fully labelled methyl groups, and is more consistent than the SVG version currently in use, which labels one methyl group but does not label the other two. (though methyl groups shouldn't really be labelled) . In case anyone is wondering, this is the chemical DEET. 184.144.163.241 (talk) 11:59, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: We don't have explicit licensing information for the first version, though {{PD-ineligible}} probably applies. —Bkell (talk) 22:33, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If we can't move both, then the current one could be moved to commons. (as Deet.png) 184.144.163.241 (talk) 05:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MayapanUrn.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dated as 1957, Mexican law says these works remain under copyright for 100 years after the death of the last surviving author.[3] Kelly ^hi! 17:41, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also File:ToninaINAH.jpg, same situation. Kelly ^hi! 17:42, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That was one my early uploads, at the time I think I misunderstood the "no notice" for pre-1970s publications as being a general rule rather than only for US printed works. Sorry. Delete. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ferrocene.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, redundant to File:Ferrocene kealy.svg Kelly ^hi! 17:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't be redundant to an incorrect model of the molecule, which the one you linked is wrong. The correct one is File:Ferrocene.svg that makes it redundant. — raeky t 17:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gorevietnam.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:AlGoreVietnam.png. Kelly ^hi! 17:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dexamethasone.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, redundant to File:Dexamethasone.svg Kelly ^hi! 18:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
'salright. Kill it. JFW | T@lk 20:44, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Matriz3 counterfeit coin problem.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No forseen use. MGA73 (talk) 22:01, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Matriz2 counterfeit coin problem.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No forseen use. MGA73 (talk) 22:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nickelodeon Studios After Blue Man Group.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unusable due to blatant watermark. Not used anywhere. Beao 23:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.