Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 May 14
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
UNDELETE_REASON Tomseddon (talk) 18:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC) Please can someone email me the content of this page that was deleted a couple of hours ago. The page was deleted most probably because i did not finnish it quick enough, i intend to finish it in my sandbox and then reinstate it
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
I'm aware of this article's much deleted history (combo of speedy and AfDs) and am not doubting that it was not notable at the time. However in the interim it has received secondary coverage including The Age and The New York Times, and I've prepared a draft User:Travellingcari/Steve.museum based on that secondary coverage. I have included some of the primary sources, but that's because I believe they help explain what the project is. I have, however, removed a lot of the PR speak that was quite unencyclopedic. Keeper76 userfied this for me and I will notify him of this DRV momentarily. Thoughts? Thanks! TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 18:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
UNDELETE_REASON I don't understand why this page was deleted several times. It may have been for lack of content, however, I feel this is a very important article since it represents the first example of investigative journalism before In Cold Blood by Truman Capote. I am willing to work on developing this article, since it's important to Argentina's history and also to literary scholar's purposes, too. I feel that it may have been lacking sources in the beginning and I feel I could quickly bring this up to a average quality page by basing the article off of the Spanish version and off of sources I'm familiar with regarding Walsh. Neagley (talk) 17:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
I have no beef with how this deletion (and the others at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 February 26#Nevada State Route 805 → USA Parkway and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 April 11#Nevada State Highway 805 → USA Parkway) were handled, but I'd like to be able to recreate them because the media has used the number to refer to the road: [4] This was not mentioned in the deletion discussion. NE2 07:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Proceedural review. Additional Articles were added into the nomination by seperate Editor (not the original AFD nominator). Concerns were raised, and never addressed, involving not following the proscribed process for proposing multiple deletions. Although I feel I know what the outcome will be, AFD closers should adheer to transparency and clarity when not following guidlines and proceedures, and explain such actions clearly in the close statement. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 03:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/March 23, 2004 was closed as no consensus. I was just about to close this as delete. The reason was that the closer wasn't willing to "create policy" however, I felt that there was precedents to delete these if desired, such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/September 25, 1988 and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/November 22, 1963 (which ended up redirected to one event). Plus, the consensus I saw to easily be delete. I was like to see this overturned and deleted. Wizardman 03:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |