Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zetrix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Tetris variants#Unofficial games. --Der yck C. 23:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zetrix

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Software that appears to be just another Tetris clone. No evidence of third party coverage, does not meet WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG. Kinu ^t/_c 22:34, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, or Redirect to List of Tetris variants. I suggested to the original contributor that Zetrix hadn't received enough coverage. But perhaps the Clubic piece ([1]) is a reliable source and enough for verification at the "List of" article. I'd like a second opinion on that site, though. Marasmusine (talk) 09:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Marasmusine (talk) 09:29, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Keep. Give me some time for the improvement. This is not just another Tetris clone. It is a 3D version with a beautiful graphics. :) But talking serious - I want this article to be kept. I will try to make it better. Teyandee (talk) 16:55, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:02, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done some improvements. Teyandee (talk) 12:12, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I'm sorry, Reloaded.org and MobyGames don't meet our standards for reliable sources. Marasmusine (talk) 14:02, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 07:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:N and WP:V. Wyatt Riot (talk) 12:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What information do you want to verify?

1) Rules are similar to the Tetris

2) Features are taken from the game and can be verified by readme.txt. (Despite the Zetrix v2.0 specified in the file, its contents are same as in file that comes with 2.1 version.)

3) However, there is a problem with a System requirements verifiability. Couldn`t find a reliable site with full requirements (Processor/RAM/HDD space/DirectX version) so I took the data form 2 sites.

Teyandee (talk) 07:55, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The entire article must be based on reliable, third-party, published sources. As it stands, there are no reliable references in the article, and I haven't been able to find any using a Google search. This is one of the key principles of our notability policy, which is what decides whether subjects merit inclusion in Wikipedia. Wyatt Riot (talk) 10:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, but I also couldn`t find any reliable sources that can provide full article coverage. :(. Teyandee (talk) 14:41, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.