Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach McKelvie
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. bd2412 T 23:14, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Zach McKelvie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks the significant independent coverage to meet WP:GNG and also fails to meet any of the hockey notability criteria at WP:NHOCKEY. Being all-conference is not grounds for notability. He played only 104 games in the AHL, where he scored only 5 points, and then became an assistant or associate head coach at Army. None of these show notability. Papaursa (talk) 19:10, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 19:10, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete — McKelvie falls well short of the 200-game minimum WP:NHOCKEY describes. For that reason, we need to access him based on GNG and I cannot find enough in-depth, secondary sources on him to say he meets even that.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 19:21, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:27, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:08, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:09, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.