Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouScience
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:29, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- YouScience (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
promotional paid article for non-notable company. All the references are local, except for one brief treatment in a combination article. DGG ( talk ) 22:37, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:37, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:38, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:38, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (talk) 20:20, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (talk) 20:20, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Inclusion of the company's product as one of several briefly discussed in the Entrepreneur article is insufficient for notability. The remaining references to fund-raising and local usage of their products verify that it is a company going about its business, but are also insufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH. There is also a 2014 paper {[1] – via HighBeam (subscription required) ) about the company's product, though it has affiliated co-authors. Overall I am not seeing sufficient for WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 08:56, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.