Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yasin Handuleh Wacays

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yasin Handuleh Wacays

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

disputed draftification, Contains WP:OR, eg: leaving the need for a conservative Islamic party and the ~~sprucing~~sourcing, while it may show what it purports to show, is recent enough to require linking. Not ready for mainspace. Optimal solution might be to return to Draft for improvement, but I view that to be unlikely to bear fruit. Over to the community 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Somalia. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find any coverage in books under the English or Somali titles. Most of the content seems to be about the party rather than the person. Maybe that is notable? Phil Bridger (talk) 17:26, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's not enough here, in either the substance or the sourcing, to establish the permanent notability of a person who doesn't pass WP:NPOL. Bearcat (talk) 13:15, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
comment- Although the article at a glance gives impression of him being notable but it certainly lacks the coverages/references Surya^beej ^⋠talk⋡ 08:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.