Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-Seed 4000
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Flowerparty☀ 01:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Supertall building supposedly proposed to be built in Japan. No reliable sources - this looks like someone's pipe dream with no substantial chance of being constructed. At any rate, Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball — write the article once it's under construction. Sandstein 20:21, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOT a crystal ball. -- stubblyhead | T/c 20:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Stifle (talk) 19:02, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Other proposed superstructure articles exist, such as The Illinois.Patken4 19:05, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Though it probably won't be built anytime soon, it is worth keeping. It's not a crystal ball, but it notes down potential creations. Skinnyweed 22:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Per above. Hezzy 01:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. If it is an existing design, whether it will be ever built or not is not important. If you want this article deleted, you should do the same for Boeing Sonic Cruiser, just to name an example of existing designs which have not being realized yet (or never to be made). The relevant policy WP:NOT, correctly applied would not let us accept someone's general idea for a new building.--FocalPoint 19:20, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Patken4 and FocalPoint. Tijuana Brass¡Épa!-E@ 00:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Per FocalPoint. Driax 23:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. (per FocalPoint. ) --Azazell0 21:06, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - verifiable, interesting, well formatted and appropriate. Jhamez84 23:10, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.