Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrong Again Dan!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tawker (talk) 07:04, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Again Dan!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book. Fails WP:NOTBOOK. reddogsix (talk) 23:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Less than 50 worldcat holdings. Neither the author nor his books are the least notable. DGG ( talk ) 00:39, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any reviews or significant coverage. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.