Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonjong station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. The other nominations will be considered separately, as the nomination was not bundled. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm (talk) 10:57, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wonjong station

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling AfDs. Significa liberdade (talk) 02:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Siheung Daeya station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Sinhyeon station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siheung City Hall station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siu station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Wonsi station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Seonbu station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Dalmi station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siheung Neunggok station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.

Delete: Searches for its English and Korean names return nothing. Given the station was only opened 30 days ago, also perhaps a case of WP:TOOSOON. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [reply]
- Keep per Eastmain's references. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 02:16, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and South Korea. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:47, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. @ClydeFranklin: I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:47, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per cites added by Eastmain. Meets GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 15:44, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.