Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/With Love (2018 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 23:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With Love (2018 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. No big release, won no awards, only received media coverage for two weeks in November 2018. Badbluebus (talk) 21:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Film, and Canada. Badbluebus (talk) 21:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep GNG/N is easily met, and we don't delete articles for films either based on revenue or awards acclaim, and for most current theatrical films, two weeks of press is incredibly standard. This is a very poor nomination and I'm just going to say you don't read French so you didn't do in-language WP:BEFORE work, which must be done before nomination. Nate • (chatter) 22:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going mostly by what is written on WP:NFILM here. When it comes to how long coverage should last, it says that movies can be considered notable if they are subjects of "at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release." The notability page, on the other hand, says that "Brief bursts of news coverage may not sufficiently demonstrate notability. However, sustained coverage is an indicator of notability, as described by notability of events." I don't know, a few weeks of coverage only by French-language sources does not seem to be enough to cut it. Badbluebus (talk) 23:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. When it comes to top-level national film awards such as the Canadian Screen Awards, NFILM does not require the awards to have been won, and only requires award nominations. And "at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release" is just one option, out of several alternatives, for how a film's notability can be demonstrated, not a core requirement that all films always have to meet — most films that do have articles can't meet that, in fact, because most films don't ever get any significant new coverage again once they've aged out of current theatrical release. So that's one option out of several for getting a film over the notability bar, not any sort of "base requirement"; a film that doesn't pass that particular notability criterion can still pass several other notability criteria, such as receiving nominations for top-level national film awards. Bearcat (talk) 02:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw. Badbluebus (talk) 02:07, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.