Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual target emulation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 00:07, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual target emulation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NEO. A marketing term that sources aren't reporting on, just a phrase used internally it seems. Fails criteria for inclusion. Dennis 23:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Subject is not significant, there are not any references, and there doesn't appear to be a great amount of room for improvement. If these concerns can be addressed in the short-term, I may change my mind, but this is my current position for now. Dustin (talk) 01:18, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: If it merits mention anywhere, it does not seem to require a separate article, and doesn't help our readership by being in a separate article.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 13:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.