Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent F. A. Golphin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:24, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent F. A. Golphin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability guidelines at WP:AUTHOR and WP:ACADEMIC. PROD contested. There's Google hits but no news, no good sources about him. When debating notability amongst authors, it's not what they write but what reliable sources write about them. The two references quotes as demonstrating his notability in the contesting of the PROD were both press releases. Ifnord (talk) 20:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 20:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 20:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 20:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:03, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:ACADEMIC. Mostly primary/self-published sources. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 02:11, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find the significant independent coverage needed to meet WP:GNG and he doesn't appear to meet WP:NAUTHOR. Papaursa (talk) 21:50, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He seems to have published a fair number of books but searching found zero reliably-published reviews of any of them. That's not a good sign for WP:AUTHOR nor WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:36, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.