Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Village of Charlie Creek

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Populated place that seems to lack either legal recognition for WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG coverage. RL0919 (talk) 22:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Village of Charlie Creek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not established per WP:GEOLAND. It's a subdivision off of a state highway. (Its actual name is "The Villages at Charlie Creek") I PROD this earlier today and the creator removed it based on labels in Wikimapia - the website grabs articles that have {{coord}} data...which is the case here. – The Grid (talk) 19:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It does have a community center you can see on google maps road view.Super (talk) 17:16, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Does the fact it has a community center and Church both named Charlie Creek add anything? There had to be enough organization to build said center and a church.Super (talk) 17:12, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep A community center and a church coupled with a sizable population makes me lean towards a keep. Simply being a majority mobile home doesn't make it any less of a village or community. It also has public utilities listed with the state of Florida as a village.Super (talk) 23:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The village is by name only here - a misnomer to market the land. There are no records within GNIS where some form of categorization is made on being a populated place. Public utilities mean absolutely nothing here when they are required regardless of public or private ownership of land. Easements are used in either case. – The Grid (talk) 22:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.