Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vignana Jyothi Institute of Management

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 23:26, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vignana Jyothi Institute of Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:RS to establish notability. Does not satisfy WP:schooloutcomes or WP:nschool or wp:org. Vikram Vincent 13:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC) * Propose a merge with the university page, since that is notable. Vikram Vincent 10:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 13:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 13:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 13:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Single source in article is to a 404 page; from the url it is a WordPress blog and the page is a PDF listing of schools. Very doubtful this is SIGCOV and it cannot be verified in anycase. BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, all directory style database listings and nothing that supports most of the article's content, so it is probably OR. Fails GNG and ORGCRIT. Since it is almost all OR unsupported by sources, nothing to merge, but no objection to a redirect if there is support for it.  // Timothy :: talk  10:50, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:37, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Go Phightins! 11:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.