Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vhoto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 04:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vhoto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no true 3rd party refs, except information on initial funding. DGG ( talk ) 22:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now and draft and userfy later if needed as News, browsers and Highbeam found several links but perhaps nothing for a better article currently as they were all from May 2014 so there hasn't been any other coverage. SwisterTwister talk 22:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is about a company and its propriary process. It fails WP:CORP for lack of in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources. The May 2014 articles were news articles based on its initial press releases. --Bejnar (talk) 17:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Founded last year, got a couple of reviews, but seems short of coverage for GNG purposes. Seems to already be out of business or reorganized--website is dead, other than message, "Thank You! We are so thankful for your support over the past year! Although Vhoto is taking a different path, we hope you continue to record life! Thanks for sharing your lives with us through GIFs and pics on Vhoto. It's been an incredible journey!" --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 19:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.