Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States anti-government unrest

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

United States anti-government unrest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. This article appears to consist of original research, especially novel synthesis of information about a variety of events in (especially) recent US history in an attempt to connect them. Put succinctly, this article fails WP:NOT. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 23:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 23:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 23:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's possible that article was deleted as well. In any event, if there were another article, this would (at best) be an A10 candidate. Even then this is just a pile of synth with no real indication that they're related even under the title "anti-government" (see LjL's comment below). —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 03:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete You're right, since many of these aren't explicitly antigovernment and the other list might still exist in another form somewhere and even if it didn't it might just be best to start it completely anew instead of with this. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 12:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.