Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truro Civic Society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:28, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Truro Civic Society

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe this charitable organisation meets WP:ORG. It is a local organisation dealing with local issues of planning and heritage in an English city with fewer than 20,000 residents. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of civic societies, possibly starting out as a section within civic society. Civic society is notable, some civic societies could be, but there's no indication as yet that Truro's is. There is little in this article other than "It is the civic society for Truro" and that, together with a foundation date and any notable current or past chairs could easily be listed in a table.

Further, I expect that Bert Biscoe will be back at AfD soon, given the recent indef ban of A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver (talk · contribs). Andy Dingley (talk) 10:59, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 11:06, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 11:06, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:45, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can only seem to find passing mentions of this society which doesn't warrant an article on its own, but as some mentions are by quite notable organisations I would support merging it into a list article as the content of the article isn't wholly unencyclopedic. --Donald Trung (Talk) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 09:06, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- does not meet WP:NORG & significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:59, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 2 refs in the article, 1 primary 1 404, a small charity in a small town, google showing nothing but routine. Szzuk (talk) 10:42, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.