Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thoughts of Ionesco (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Kurykh (talk) 03:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts of Ionesco

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article that resembles a fanpage. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thoughts of Ionesco The Banner talk 11:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The article needs some work, but meets WP:BAND per the following sources, and the first three sites listed below are approved by WikiProject Albums and included on its sources list. There's also this source from Revolver and this source from Alternative Press, but they contain primarily interview content. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Punknews
Blabbermouth
Stylus Magazine
The Michigan Journal. Quote: "By Mike McNelis Asst. Music Director - WUMD Radio. If first impressions are lasting ones, as I often conclude, Thoughts of Ionesco is going to frequent my turntable for many years to come. This group of local boys is bringing the most brutal ..." (subscription required) – Appears to be a review

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.