Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theistic humanism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 12:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Theistic humanism

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BEFORE done. This appears to be a neologism - circa 2014, perhaps?) - with very little actual use. As always, happy to be proven wrong. Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 10:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Theistic humanism and a critique of Wiredu's notion of supernaturalism, Dukor’s Theistic Humanism Panacea to Globalization, and Theistic Humanism and the Critique of Monotheism as the Most Evolved Religion are all journal articles dealing with the concept. Zoozaz1 (talk) 04:46, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This isn't a neologism, it's both well-established in African theological study, and also reflects an older tendency in humanism which I'd argue is under-represented on Wikipedia. The article could do with some additional work to highlight the latter (I'm the original author, btw). Bmcollier (talk) 08:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.