Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thebroken
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. BD2412 talk 23:54, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Not notable. Delete. brenneman(t)(c) 01:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Kevin Rose. Kertrats | Talk 03:35, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you specify for the clarity of the closing admin: A bare redirect leaves the article in place in history, and thus counts as a keep. Delete and redirect would not. - brenneman(t)(c) 04:17, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see that it matters one way or the other except for GFDL reasons perhaps (not certain how that works), but I'll specify to Delete and redirect as above. Kertrats | Talk 16:37, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Geez, Brenneman, you're really determined to see this thing go, eh? Wandering oojah 19:25, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you specify for the clarity of the closing admin: A bare redirect leaves the article in place in history, and thus counts as a keep. Delete and redirect would not. - brenneman(t)(c) 04:17, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nn CLW 12:25, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If any content is merged it cannot be deleted (GFDL attribution requirement). Just redirect, deletion not needed. - Mgm|(talk) 18:00, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- That's slightly incorrect. The history can be pasted into the talk page, or I believe an admin can perform a history merge. Either one or the other will satisfy GFDL. - brenneman(t)(c) 22:21, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Very notable, it was one of the first popular web shows. --Hoovernj 18:54, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Popular videozine, from what I gather. Google search (thebroken + "kevin rose") returns 18,000 hits. Wandering oojah 19:14, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect per Brenneman. Just barely non-notable for me. Johntex\talk 19:51, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable. Eliot 22:25, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No independent, verifiable evidence of encyclopedic notability presented. Gamaliel 00:13, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. nonnotable 482 unique google hits (rather than 18,000), nonverifiable. mikka (t) 02:17, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Popular videozine with a well known host. bbx 17:06, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- At the risk of repeating myself, and in the nices possible way, what makes you say this?
brenneman(t)(c) 00:02, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- At the risk of repeating myself, and in the nices possible way, what makes you say this?
- Keep [1] Grue 12:27, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Very popular videozine, definitely keep! Salvag 18:24, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.