Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tenenbaum Family
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to The Royal Tenenbaums. --BDD (talk) 18:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The Tenenbaum Family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable characters. Not covered in enough reliable sources, and no sources given. If there's a list of characters it could be redirected to, then that's also an option. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Also nominating the following articles, created by the same author from the same movie.
- Henry Sherman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Pagoda (The Royal Tenenbaums) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Adding one more to the list:
- Redirect Henry Sherman and The Tenenbaum Family to The Royal Tenenbaums as plausible search terms. I already did that to Eli Cash. Delete Pagoda (The Royal Tenenbaums) as a non-plausible dab'ed title without history. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect Per FreeRangeFrog. Were this AFD not open, I would've been WP:BOLD and done that myself. --71.199.125.210 (talk) 00:46, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to The Royal Tenenbaums. Easy call, should have been boldly done rather than hauled to AFD. Carrite (talk) 16:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.