Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Testability

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 03:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Testability[edit]

Delete -- it's been marked "Move to Wiktionary" for 6 months now, and nobody seems to have taken any notice -- Gurch 19:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete --MaNeMeBasat 08:27, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The concept of testability is closely related to, but significantly different from the concepts of contingency, defeasibility, and falsifiability that are important to the subjects of scientific method, philosophy of science, and the demarcation problem involved in distinguishing science from pseudoscience. I will soon be devloping this article a little further in those and several other connections. Jon Awbrey 16:40, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless expanded. -- King of Hearts ^talk 01:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep As per Jon Awbrey this is an important logical concept. It has already been expanded enough for the Move to Wiktionary tag to be removed. Seano1 18:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep a fundamental concept in philosophy of science. JoshuaZ 03:39, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.