Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tesla's Tributes and honors

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge back into Nikla Tesla, from which this was forked, and delete this. CDC (talk) 02:08, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla's Tributes and honors

Consists of text duplicated from main article. Allowing sub-page would only encourage grotesque lengthening William M. Connolley 2005-07-07 20:59:30 (UTC)

yet more excess Tesla-phila (he was a great chap, yes, but doesn't deserve this slavish adulation) William M. Connolley 2005-07-07 21:03:16 (UTC).
Delete. Jesus, people, JUST WRITE A NIKOLA TESLA ARTICLE. Dcarrano July 7, 2005 21:18 (UTC)
delete too much already Merge with tesla, but trimmed. It only should be in one place Salsb 7 July 2005 22:52 (UTC)

Note - Just to let ppl know that this was split off from the main Tesla article because some individuals (like William M. Connolley, among others) was complaining about the article size. Now that it's split off, he'd like to delete it (Salsb seems to be editing with the same POV). It belongs either in the Tesla article or as an individual article. Dcarrano, that was what was tried and because there are ppl which edit with a anti-Tesla POV, they take the information out. 216.185.232.203 8 July 2005 00:37 (UTC)

Extremely Strong Keep/Merge, this should be merged back into the main Nikola Tesla article, but if not it should be kept because Nikola Tesla is very notable. For example won the IEEE Edison Medal, and a 2.8 Gigawatt Powerplant is named after him. He is also the only IEEE Fellow on a National Currency. The Amount of anti-tesla bias on the talk page of the main article is sad. Klonimus 8 July 2005 09:40 (UTC)

Ahem... for the notice of those last two people ***the information is already in the Tesla Article***. Its been split off into its own subpage, whilst being retained in the article too! Does that make sense? No. William M. Connolley 2005-07-08 11:20:05 (UTC).

No it's not in the article, it has been removed. What I'm saying is that the contents of this article should be merged back into the main article. Klonimus 8 July 2005 18:46 (UTC)

Ah, OK, fine: thats exactly my position. No one is suggessting that the text should leave wikipedia (perhaps trim a trifle...). When I put up this VFD, it was in the Tesla article as well. William M. Connolley 2005-07-08 19:04:49 (UTC).

Delete, that's overkill on one particular person. Tesla is notable but this is trivial. R adiant _>|< July 8, 2005 13:42 (UTC)

Quick note to admins, I'm in the process of merging this back into the main Nikola Tesla Article. Please let this stay up for a bit. Klonimus 9 July 2005 03:19 (UTC)

Delete title, merge content back into main article. -Willmcw 23:02, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.