Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Swift and Def Leppard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:32, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift and Def Leppard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably the only episode of CMT Crossroads that has a standalone article. Regardless, I think it fails WP:GNG since there is little coverage on this episode. Having the names of two of the biggest music acts to it does not make it notable on its own. (talk) 17:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. (talk) 17:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. (talk) 17:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is definitely non trivial coverage of the collaboration. It may be that, and the dvd release which warrant the notability. It was the first, according to this link episode, to be released on dvd, and possibly the only one (from a search of “crossroads dvd”. Information from these secondary sources should certainly be incorporated into the article, should it be kept. –DLManiac (talk) 17:43, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I could get behind that. Even something like CMT Crossroads: Taylor Swift & Def Leppard (redirect already exists) and rewrite it as a DVD release (I think this is what makes it MORE than just an episode and sets it apart. It spawned an award nomination and an encore performance at said awards. DLManiac (talk) 07:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Even as a DVD release, I do not think it satisfies WP:GNG with minimal resources to expand the article. (talk) 10:45, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.