Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TAZ 90 (camouflage)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of military clothing camouflage patterns. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TAZ 90 (camouflage)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Swiss Army uniform camouflage pattern. I happen to have worn this uniform for some 700 days of militia service (and shot some of the photos in the article), but there's no way that camo pattern is notable per WP:N; and moreover the article is entirely unsourced. There could be some niche militaria publications covering this topic at the appropriate depth. But I'm not aware of them, they are not cited, and these kind of books tend to be print-only and in German, in my experience, so Google is of little help. - If there had been any useful content, I'd have merged it to Equipment of the Swiss Armed Forces, but there's only some unsourced minutiae and an image gallery. Sandstein 21:55, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as indiscriminate collection of information. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:00, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to List of military clothing camouflage patterns. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 21:53, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect as stated above. Not notable for stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 13:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.