Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superplastic (Company)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:06, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Superplastic (Company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company with no significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NCORP and general notability guideline. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:10, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:12, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:12, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Sources fail WP:ORGCRIT, and I haven't found anything better. Not to mention, the vast quantity of inline external links make this appear to be nothing but WP:PROMO. Regardless, the company is simply not notable enough for inclusion. Jmertel23 (talk) 13:04, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. The involvement of several WP:SPAs is highly suspicious too. I filed a SPI case which found them to be technically unrelated, but WP:MEAT seems likely. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.