Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Curry's Unanimous MVP Season
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Stephen Curry's Unanimous MVP Season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An unnecessary WP:CONTENTFORK of Stephen Curry#Unanimous MVP and historic season (2015–2016). I don't see the potential for WP:SUMMARYSTYLE here. Details can also be placed at his team's season page, 2015–16 Golden State Warriors season. —Bagumba (talk) 13:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Basketball. —Bagumba (talk) 13:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Curry's own page has substantial content about this season. Any relevant information about this season contained in the MVP article that is not already covered there can be merged there. If there is no relevant information missing from the Curry article then this can be simply deleted. Rlendog (talk) 18:04, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. No need to duplicate the same content. – Sabbatino (talk) 15:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as an unnecessary WP:CONTENTFORK of Stephen Curry#Unanimous MVP and historic season (2015–2016). Already covered adequately there, so no need to merge. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.