Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StepSqlite
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to PL/SQL#Similar_languages. Jenks24 (talk) 09:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- StepSqlite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
My searches have found nothing to suggest any better applicable notability and there's nothing convincing from the current article to suggest it also satisfies the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Selective Merge to PL/SQL § Similar languages, where this topic is mentioned in a single sentence. This will improve the merge target article, as per WP:PRESERVE. Source searches are not indicating that the topic meets WP:N to qualify for a standalone article. North America1000 21:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Selective Merge to PL/SQL § Similar languages. I could not find multiple in depth RS to support this article, but basic facts are verifiable and this is a plausible search term. Northamerica1000 has found a good target for this topic, hence a redirect is warranted. --Mark viking (talk) 19:35, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.