Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Jovicic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Jovicic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL, has not played at a professional level. No reliable sources to show notability per WP:GNG. Tassedethe (talk) 00:34, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:NFOOTBALL as he hasn't played in a WP:FPL or in an international match. Fails WP:GNG also. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 01:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 08:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 09:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Kosack (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - hasn't played at a fully pro level Spiderone 10:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability. No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 10:34, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.