Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starfucker (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Starfucker (band)

Possibly fails WP:MUSIC Guy0307 (talk) 05:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could find no reputible sites with any large (or even small) amount of information in my google search.Oli ^OR Pyfan! 08:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete, after searching google with these parameters (as suggested by MichaelQSchmidt on my talk page) I did find a few references.Oli ^OR Pyfan! 09:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

**Comment: In addition, the only references on Starfucker (band) are their official site (which doesn't have much on it) and myspace! Oli ^OR Pyfan! 08:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep unless there is another band by this name and I'm totally confused, this band is pretty well known. Blast Ulna (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - you may be thinking of this band of the same name, who do appear to be notable. JulesH (talk) 16:18, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I'm finding it hard to find references to this Belgian band among the references to the Portland, Oregon band of the same name. Ironically, I keep seeing articles about the Portland band describing how hard it is to find them among references to the Belgian band. JulesH (talk) 16:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party coverage WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:BAND. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 16:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, pretty clearly falls short of the WP:NMG standards. Stifle (talk) 20:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional Keep - passes WP:BAND - a Google search for "starfucker belgian belgium" gives you this. Need to provide clear independent third party coverage. Radiopathy (talk) 02:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What, a bunch of blogs and a face book page! Not exactly WP:RS. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 10:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. Searching pulls up no reliable, third-party, sources. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 10:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:MUSIC. --Sloane (talk) 23:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I just did come clean-up and added a ref. — Reinyday, 05:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.